Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal Christianity"
(most popular) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Mrb, I suggest you take your [[liberal bias]] elsewhere. -- [[User:ChrisWa|ChrisWa]] | Mrb, I suggest you take your [[liberal bias]] elsewhere. -- [[User:ChrisWa|ChrisWa]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == most popular == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Could we list these "most popular denominations" for the benefit of those readers who don't know the popularity of various denominations? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:31, 26 February 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 00:31, February 27, 2008
This page is much to kind to liberals. -- ChrisWa I suggest the addition of a section on criticisms or controversy.
- No, because then people like myself will whine. -_- Fuzzy 18:47, 26 February 2008 (EST)
I finally understand conservapedia: it's a satire of what passes for conservative thought in the more extreme reaches of the 'net. That aschlafly is an absolute master of irony. This article started out as a sober rendition of liberal Christianity -- boring, boring, boring -- until aschlafly put his magic touch to it. Now it's hilariously funny, as long as I remember that this whole site is a parody of an actual encyclopedia! The joke's on me: it just took me too long to fully appreciate the subtle irony that permeates this site. And aschlafly -- if you're following this; if you're not really a committee of professional comedians -- my hat's off to you, sir! Keep up the wickedly satirical work; and you can count on me to keep the joke quiet, so that other pilgrims can experience the belly laugh I'm enjoying right now. Mrb
Mrb, I suggest you take your liberal bias elsewhere. -- ChrisWa
most popular
Could we list these "most popular denominations" for the benefit of those readers who don't know the popularity of various denominations? HelpJazz 19:31, 26 February 2008 (EST)