Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal censorship"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(if you refuse to address the issue)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I'm going to move the counteraccusation to a debate page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:11, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
I'm going to move the counteraccusation to a debate page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:11, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 +
:Ed, I appreciate your reversion of my reversion. But my reading of that is that TK says we might block when opposing views are parotted and nauseam, ie the block is for disruptive editing and arguing just to delay and undermine CP, rather than being an ideological block. therefore the inference by the person who made the accusation was incorrect so I reverted it  and I blocked her for untruth. if you disagree with me you may wish to unblock also. cheers, [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:16, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 17:16, 25 November 2008

I reverted the "censorship". Now make your case. ... Okay, I waited but no one is addressing the issue of whether liberals are using censorship to suppress opposing views.

I'm going to move the counteraccusation to a debate page. --Ed Poor Talk 12:11, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Ed, I appreciate your reversion of my reversion. But my reading of that is that TK says we might block when opposing views are parotted and nauseam, ie the block is for disruptive editing and arguing just to delay and undermine CP, rather than being an ideological block. therefore the inference by the person who made the accusation was incorrect so I reverted it and I blocked her for untruth. if you disagree with me you may wish to unblock also. cheers, Bugler 12:16, 25 November 2008 (EST)