Talk:Liberal indoctrination

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheHeroExcelsior (Talk | contribs) at 13:50, August 11, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Seeing the link about Climate Cops on the front page made me look for something like this, so I created it when I saw there was no such page. Please feel free to add more! --WPalmer 19:11, 30 July 2008 (EDT)


What exactly does it mean to "ignore" the Pledge of Allegiance? HelpJazz 18:34, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

It means to downplay it or skip it entirely in class. You know what I meant. Don't play semantics here, please. --WPalmer 18:47, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
If I knew what you meant I wouldn't have asked. Don't get short with me, please. HelpJazz 20:02, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

Why mommy is a democrat

While I may never buy this book for my kids its not an example of liberal indoctrination. People are allowed to write books on whatever they like and still more people are allowed to buy whatever books they like. Its hardly an indoctrination if you can choose not to read it. ClarkeD 20:08, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

Dungeons and Dragons

I play D&D, and Magic The Gathering. They are nothing more than Dice and Card games respectively. In D&D, you have the option to play villains, but it's only acting and the players know that. Dungeon Masters have a habit of making it hard for players of evil characters. In D&D, the questing knight, the valiant monk, the wise sorcerer are the good guys. Those are the people you want to play. In regards to M:TG, you cannot say they will lead to amorality any more than you could say that poker and blackjack lead to it. Therefore, I wish to remove that portion of the article and have more contributed to the indoctrination of children in public schools. No one mentioned it is a shame that our tax dollars pay for turning our children into immoral liberals. TheHeroExcelsior 09:50, 11 August 2009 (EDT)