Talk:Liberal vandalism

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"Either by fear of losing or by hatred for America, these small-minded individuals relish the havoc they create." If there's "no way" to cite this, then it shouldn't be in the article. HelpJazz 14:42, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

How would you describe their behavoir? Do you know what they are thinking? If they don't relish, then they are forced to do it? or maybe they feel it is their duty? or maybe genetic disease? Let's call it what it is, if it is too outlandish, replace. I don't feel it is necessary but do as you may.--Jpatt 15:15, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
Do you know what they are thinking? Nobody does, and speculation doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. (Unless it is someone else's speculation, then you attribute it to that someone, and cite it.) HelpJazz 15:20, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
you are making it too technical, you know they do it for enjoyment, remove I don't care--Jpatt 15:33, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
I'm not trying to make it too technical, it's just that non-essays shouldn't have speculation or opinion. HelpJazz 19:41, 7 October 2008 (EDT)


Thanks HelpJazz, that's what I meant. I put "others" in there because I really couldn't think of other things that make liberal vandalism separate than regular old vandalism.--IanG 15:12, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

It's kind of like a hate crime. There's nothing different between a "hate murder" and a "regular murder" other than the murderer's disposition towards the murdered. HelpJazz 15:20, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

Pattern of liberal vandalism on conservative wikis

This section just isn't any good. I see what you are trying to get at but (a) you missed the mark and (b) unless you get a confession from one of these "vandals", you can't ever really know their political orientation, their thoughts or their motives. And good luck ever being able to cite it. HelpJazz 17:38, 22 October 2008 (EDT)