Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lust"
From Conservapedia
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:The article will remain as it is, thank you very much. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:47, 7 March 2008 (EST) | :The article will remain as it is, thank you very much. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:47, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
::I'm not saying change it. --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ::I'm not saying change it. --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :::What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. [[User:Koba|Koba]] 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 7 March 2008
Wow! Feature this right now! I never saw a more subtlely biased article in my life. --MrMetalFLower 14:42, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- The article will remain as it is, thank you very much. DanH 14:47, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I'm not saying change it. --MrMetalFLower 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. Koba 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I'm not saying change it. --MrMetalFLower 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST)
