Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lust"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:::What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. [[User:Koba|Koba]] 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 
:::What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. [[User:Koba|Koba]] 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 
::::It was a joke. I was just saying the article goes right out and says "This is bad" :P --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 14:57, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 
::::It was a joke. I was just saying the article goes right out and says "This is bad" :P --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 14:57, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 +
In defining a negative term such as lust I would naturally express it in 'negative' terms. Had I been defining 'desire' I might have expressed it differently. But this was a wanted term. If you would like to help here, have a look at the wanted terms list and have a crack at a few. [[User:Koba|Koba]] 14:59, 7 March 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 19:59, 7 March 2008

Wow! Feature this right now! I never saw a more subtlely biased article in my life. --MrMetalFLower 14:42, 7 March 2008 (EST)

The article will remain as it is, thank you very much. DanH 14:47, 7 March 2008 (EST)
I'm not saying change it. --MrMetalFLower 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST)
What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. Koba 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST)
It was a joke. I was just saying the article goes right out and says "This is bad" :P --MrMetalFLower 14:57, 7 March 2008 (EST)

In defining a negative term such as lust I would naturally express it in 'negative' terms. Had I been defining 'desire' I might have expressed it differently. But this was a wanted term. If you would like to help here, have a look at the wanted terms list and have a crack at a few. Koba 14:59, 7 March 2008 (EST)