Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lust"
From Conservapedia
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::It was a joke. I was just saying the article goes right out and says "This is bad" :P --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 14:57, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ::::It was a joke. I was just saying the article goes right out and says "This is bad" :P --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 14:57, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
In defining a negative term such as lust I would naturally express it in 'negative' terms. Had I been defining 'desire' I might have expressed it differently. But this was a wanted term. If you would like to help here, have a look at the wanted terms list and have a crack at a few. [[User:Koba|Koba]] 14:59, 7 March 2008 (EST) | In defining a negative term such as lust I would naturally express it in 'negative' terms. Had I been defining 'desire' I might have expressed it differently. But this was a wanted term. If you would like to help here, have a look at the wanted terms list and have a crack at a few. [[User:Koba|Koba]] 14:59, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :I said it was a joke, QED, it was a joke. --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 15:01, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | #intense sexual desire or appetite. | ||
| + | #uncontrolled or illicit sexual desire or appetite; lecherousness. | ||
| + | #a passionate or overmastering desire or craving (usually fol. by for): a lust for power. | ||
| + | |||
| + | that's a dictionary definition, in case anyone feels like increasing the length and depth of the article. --[[User:MrMetalFLower|MrMetalFLower]] 15:01, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:01, March 7, 2008
Wow! Feature this right now! I never saw a more subtlely biased article in my life. --MrMetalFLower 14:42, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- The article will remain as it is, thank you very much. DanH 14:47, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I'm not saying change it. --MrMetalFLower 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. Koba 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- It was a joke. I was just saying the article goes right out and says "This is bad" :P --MrMetalFLower 14:57, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- What is your problem, then? The very term 'lust' doesn't exactly express approval of the act. Koba 14:56, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I'm not saying change it. --MrMetalFLower 14:49, 7 March 2008 (EST)
In defining a negative term such as lust I would naturally express it in 'negative' terms. Had I been defining 'desire' I might have expressed it differently. But this was a wanted term. If you would like to help here, have a look at the wanted terms list and have a crack at a few. Koba 14:59, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I said it was a joke, QED, it was a joke. --MrMetalFLower 15:01, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- intense sexual desire or appetite.
- uncontrolled or illicit sexual desire or appetite; lecherousness.
- a passionate or overmastering desire or craving (usually fol. by for): a lust for power.
that's a dictionary definition, in case anyone feels like increasing the length and depth of the article. --MrMetalFLower 15:01, 7 March 2008 (EST)
