Difference between revisions of "Talk:North American Man/Boy Love Association"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Agree with Karajou)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Earlier there was a user who tried several times to add a link to NAMBLA's website in the article of that name, and this user was given tacit support and approval by others for his actions.  There are people in Conservapedia, including Andy, who '''WILL NEVER TOLERATE''' any site that advocates child molesting, and I don't want to hear the excuses as to NAMBLA's so-called intentions.  If I see anyone post a link to a child-molesting site, I will assume they support child molesting and they will never be allowed in this website again.  If I see direct evidence that such an editor may be more involved in child molesting then providing a link, then Andy will be notified as well as federal and state law enforcement.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:12, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Earlier there was a user who tried several times to add a link to NAMBLA's website in the article of that name, and this user was given tacit support and approval by others for his actions.  There are people in Conservapedia, including Andy, who '''WILL NEVER TOLERATE''' any site that advocates child molesting, and I don't want to hear the excuses as to NAMBLA's so-called intentions.  If I see anyone post a link to a child-molesting site, I will assume they support child molesting and they will never be allowed in this website again.  If I see direct evidence that such an editor may be more involved in child molesting then providing a link, then Andy will be notified as well as federal and state law enforcement.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:12, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Agree 100 percent. There is no need for a "link" to that site. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 06:48, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:48, 28 April 2007

Earlier there was a user who tried several times to add a link to NAMBLA's website in the article of that name, and this user was given tacit support and approval by others for his actions. There are people in Conservapedia, including Andy, who WILL NEVER TOLERATE any site that advocates child molesting, and I don't want to hear the excuses as to NAMBLA's so-called intentions. If I see anyone post a link to a child-molesting site, I will assume they support child molesting and they will never be allowed in this website again. If I see direct evidence that such an editor may be more involved in child molesting then providing a link, then Andy will be notified as well as federal and state law enforcement. Karajou 00:12, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Agree 100 percent. There is no need for a "link" to that site. --Ed Poor 06:48, 28 April 2007 (EDT)