Difference between revisions of "Talk:Opposition to Christianity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Postmodernism: new section)
(disruptive)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
I'm not sure why this point is continually removed.  It is well established and now referenced that postmodernists are thoroughly antichristian. The philosophy itself is inherently antichristian, and a postmodern christian is simply a cafeteria-christianity liberal. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 14:36, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
 
I'm not sure why this point is continually removed.  It is well established and now referenced that postmodernists are thoroughly antichristian. The philosophy itself is inherently antichristian, and a postmodern christian is simply a cafeteria-christianity liberal. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 14:36, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
 +
::it's a false statement. There are many Christian Pomos (as the references articles admit), and CP should not take sides in theological debates. There is no need to reflect the views of one group of ultra-Calvinists Reformed preachers. Conservatism represents a very broad coalition of many different Christians and non-Christians, and it's highly disruptive to have them attacking each other in CP as "anti-Christian".[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 14:48, 10 September 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:48, 10 September 2009

Let's move this topic to another page with a better title. I suggest: Opposition to Christianity, which includes persecution as well as "honest" ideological disagreement. --Ed Poor Talk 12:21, 14 August 2009 (EDT)

good idea. RJJensen 15:10, 14 August 2009 (EDT)

Postmodernism

I'm not sure why this point is continually removed. It is well established and now referenced that postmodernists are thoroughly antichristian. The philosophy itself is inherently antichristian, and a postmodern christian is simply a cafeteria-christianity liberal. DouglasA 14:36, 10 September 2009 (EDT)

it's a false statement. There are many Christian Pomos (as the references articles admit), and CP should not take sides in theological debates. There is no need to reflect the views of one group of ultra-Calvinists Reformed preachers. Conservatism represents a very broad coalition of many different Christians and non-Christians, and it's highly disruptive to have them attacking each other in CP as "anti-Christian".RJJensen 14:48, 10 September 2009 (EDT)