Difference between revisions of "Talk:Project Apollo"
From Conservapedia
PaulBurnett (Talk | contribs) (Crackpot "Conspiracy Theories" are NOT "facts.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Statements purported to be "fact" appear in the "Conspiracy Theories" section. These statements are not facts but crackpot conspiracy theories. While they should properly be mentioned as such, they should not be baldly called "facts" in an encyclopedia. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 13:40, 23 August 2009 (EDT) | Statements purported to be "fact" appear in the "Conspiracy Theories" section. These statements are not facts but crackpot conspiracy theories. While they should properly be mentioned as such, they should not be baldly called "facts" in an encyclopedia. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 13:40, 23 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I agree. But in their own way these theories can be a facinating read; perhaps a separate article detailing them can be made. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:57, 23 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:57, August 23, 2009
Statements purported to be "fact" appear in the "Conspiracy Theories" section. These statements are not facts but crackpot conspiracy theories. While they should properly be mentioned as such, they should not be baldly called "facts" in an encyclopedia. PaulBurnett 13:40, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
- I agree. But in their own way these theories can be a facinating read; perhaps a separate article detailing them can be made. Karajou 13:57, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
