Difference between revisions of "Talk:Resurrection Sunday"
From Conservapedia
Double Edge (Talk | contribs) |
Double Edge (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
What's wrong with calling it Easter? [[User:DM|DM]] 11:32, 23 March 2008 (EDT) | What's wrong with calling it Easter? [[User:DM|DM]] 11:32, 23 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | This page is outrageous. Even if the name easter was taken from a pagan holiday doesn't mean that the name is pagan. It was adapted by and is accepted by almost every christian group. --[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 11:49, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | + | This page is outrageous. Even if the name easter was taken from a pagan holiday doesn't mean that the name is pagan. It was adapted by christians and is accepted by almost every christian group. --[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 11:49, 31 March 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:49, March 31, 2008
How is this the "proper" term when you acknowledge on CP Terms article that you just made it up? I now declare that "Christmas" is now properly known as "Fuglehorn Day", a term I just created.--Jdellaro 10:40, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
- I don't know why it's listed on Conservapedia Terms. The footnote for this article makes it clear that the term was not coined on Conservapedia. I guess it's just that it's not in widespread use, so Conservapedia is trying to increase how much it's used. Philip J. Rayment 10:48, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
What's wrong with calling it Easter? DM 11:32, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
This page is outrageous. Even if the name easter was taken from a pagan holiday doesn't mean that the name is pagan. It was adapted by christians and is accepted by almost every christian group. --Double Edge 11:49, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
