Difference between revisions of "Talk:Resurrection Sunday"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
What's wrong with calling it Easter? [[User:DM|DM]] 11:32, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
 
What's wrong with calling it Easter? [[User:DM|DM]] 11:32, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
  
This page is outrageous. Even if the name easter was taken from a pagan holiday doesn't mean that the name is pagan. It was adapted by christians and is accepted by almost every christian group. --[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 11:49, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
+
This page is outrageous. Even if the name easter was taken from a pagan holiday doesn't mean that the name is pagan. It was adapted by christians and is accepted by almost every christian group. Are you going to call those christians pagans. That's a little much conservapedia --[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 11:49, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:52, 31 March 2008

How is this the "proper" term when you acknowledge on CP Terms article that you just made it up? I now declare that "Christmas" is now properly known as "Fuglehorn Day", a term I just created.--Jdellaro 10:40, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

I don't know why it's listed on Conservapedia Terms. The footnote for this article makes it clear that the term was not coined on Conservapedia. I guess it's just that it's not in widespread use, so Conservapedia is trying to increase how much it's used. Philip J. Rayment 10:48, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

What's wrong with calling it Easter? DM 11:32, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

This page is outrageous. Even if the name easter was taken from a pagan holiday doesn't mean that the name is pagan. It was adapted by christians and is accepted by almost every christian group. Are you going to call those christians pagans. That's a little much conservapedia --Double Edge 11:49, 31 March 2008 (EDT)