Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rick Santorum"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Endorsement: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
==Senselessly==
 
==Senselessly==
 
Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST)
 
Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
== Endorsement ==
 +
 +
When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man.  Time is running out.  If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 00:21, 17 February 2012

Obsessed? HelpJazz 19:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

What would you say? HenryS 19:28, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
I was going to look at the reference to see if I could pick out a better word, but there wasn't one. So without doing any research of my own, I would say something like "there was an increase of media coverage after..." or some such verifiable claim. HelpJazz 20:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh man I just read more of the article and saw "cult-like" and "forthright and truthful". And no sources :( I should have quit while I was ahead. HelpJazz 20:32, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Senselessly

Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. Rob Smith 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST)

Endorsement

When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man. Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --CraigF 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST)