Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rosie O'Donnell"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Photo bias: thanks)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
 
Could we get a better picture so that we do not have a [[photo bias]]? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:16, 17 February 2008 (EST)
 
Could we get a better picture so that we do not have a [[photo bias]]? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:16, 17 February 2008 (EST)
 
:Done. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 11:44, 17 February 2008 (EST)
 
:Done. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 11:44, 17 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::Thanks :) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:59, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 19:59, February 17, 2008

I know it is difficult to find 'good' photos of Rosie, but the current one isn't too flattering. GodlessLiberal 21:33, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Yeah... as funny as this one is, we probably can do better. DanH 14:35, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

Left which show?

The article currently reads O'Donnell gained notice for hosting her own daytime talk show The Rosie O'Donnell Show, from 1996 to 2002. O'Donnell left the show weeks earlier than announced... Shouldn't this mention The View somewhere? PrometheusX303 07:03, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Regarding this edit

I have changed this back because, at least according to the source, O'Donnell did not "parrot" Iran's assertions. She says "There were 15 British sailors and marines who apparently went in to Iranian waters and they were seized by the Iranians" (emphasis mine). Parroting Iranian assertions would be to say that they were definitely there and Iran had right to take them, which is not what she says. Additionally, if she did parrot Iran's assertions, then the Golf of Tonkin reference wouldn't make any sense. Jazzman831 15:53, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Government and 9/11

I have removed the statement that says O'Donnel believes the government caused 9/11, since the only source was a dead link to someone's blog. That's a pretty radical accusation and needs to be backed up. Maestro 10:15, 29 December 2007 (EST)

Did you look? It was easy to find multiple additional references with even a rudimentary search. Our goal here is not to remove truth under a technicality. We don't need to cover up what she did, and you don't need to either. Learn together 14:35, 29 December 2007 (EST)
Aren't you a librarian? HelpJazz 14:40, 29 December 2007 (EST)
Good job...I found that source as well, but since the source seems to support O'Donnel's view of a government sponsored hijacking (or at least commend her for speaking out), I was loathe to cite it. Maestro 17:12, 29 December 2007 (EST)
I'm not sure this answers as many questions as it brings up. If you had verification from another source that the blog was true, to then remove them information was improper. Learn together 02:09, 2 January 2008 (EST)
I was the one who found the origonal r-blog link (which is now broken). I searched through her new r-blog, but I guess she didn't archive all of the crazy. I did a search for "wtc" and found some "ask ro" things. They aren't stupendous, but lend credibility to that other source: [1] [2] (search for "wtc" -- the indendted part is a reader's question and the unindendted part is Rosie's response). HelpJazz 13:07, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Photo bias

Could we get a better picture so that we do not have a photo bias? HelpJazz 11:16, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Done. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 11:44, 17 February 2008 (EST)
Thanks :) HelpJazz 14:59, 17 February 2008 (EST)