Talk:Sex

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chrislk02 (Talk | contribs) at 14:50, March 19, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

What about parents that want to have access to credible information on sex to educate their children? --Truth is bipartisan 01:01, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

I'm confused as to why this page has been blocked. I am aware that its probably subject to much vandalism, but there is a valid reasoning behind allowing it.--Elamdri 22:47, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Even though the page could be an informative article, it is forbidden (currently) under commandment 3 of The Conservapedia Commandments. It's not "family-friendly". --Hojimachongtalk 22:48, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Funny, isn't that how families are made?  :D --Gulik 22:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Quite XD. --Hojimachongtalk 22:51, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Personally, I feel its possible to make a family-friendly page about sex, but I respect the decision.--Elamdri 22:52, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I concur. --Hojimachongtalk 22:53, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

This page is linked to from The Ninteenth Amendment of the US constitution, and from Choice, but not from abortion. Which of these are "family friendly"? --Scott 23:38, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I too find it interesting that abortion is considered family friendly but sex itself isn't. Sulgran 23:40, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I think this needs to be taken up with Aschlafly. It is clean, can be family-friendly, and is biblically described (we can use the song of Solomon, perhaps?) --Hojimachongtalk 23:46, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
I think the general reason is that the page has been targeted by vandals ten times. MountainDew 23:48, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Well, if the page was created it could always be protected, and users could post ideas on this talk page. I really think it needs inclusion; It's awfully important, and doesn't have to be amoral or obscene or anything like that. --Hojimachongtalk 23:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Check with Aschlafly first. Geo. 00:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
I was planning on it. --Hojimachongtalk 00:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

I just want to ask... does anyone else think the place holder there is sort of funny? Anyways, I hope a page about this gets made, because quite frankly it's silly to pretend it doesn't exist, and I'm sure a family-friendly article can be made, as said before. --Ronnyreg 22:13, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

"Male and female created He them." Genesis 1:27 "And Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived... 4:1 DDG 23:23, 12 March 2007 (EDT)


The irony here is fantastic!!! Menkatron 11:07, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Eh, that's a bit bland. How about some of the hotter quotes from the Song of Solomon? :D --Scrap 01:55, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

A joke

Dont take this offensivly, when I found that this article had been deleted and protected against re-creation, I thought it was a joke. I understand that conservapedia is supposed to be family friendly. By not having an article on it here, it will encourage younger family members to search elsewhere for the information. It would not be hard to create an article, explaining the purpose of sex, perhaps some historical references to it without going into the details of how it is done etc etc. Chrislk02 10:50, 19 March 2007 (EDT)