Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skepchick"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
::Alright I will do that in future [[User:Irishtory|Irishtory]] ([[User talk:Irishtory|talk]]) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
 
::Alright I will do that in future [[User:Irishtory|Irishtory]] ([[User talk:Irishtory|talk]]) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
:::You request is petty. Clearly, a website which strenuously advocates science/rationality, should have contributors who practice sound practices when it comes to [[nutritional science]], [[exercise science]] and [[medical science]]. That is not too much to ask.  
+
:::You request is petty. Clearly, a website which strenuously advocates science/rationality, should have contributors who practice sound practices when it comes to [[nutritional science]], [[exercise science]] and [[medical science]]. That is not too much to ask. See also: [[Atheism and unscientific medical practices]]
  
:::In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates [[evolution]]ary pseuodoscience which has contributors who fail to understand applied biology is worth noting. See also: [[Atheism and unscientific medical practices]] and [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:59, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
+
:::In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates [[evolution]]ary pseuodoscience which has contributors who fail to understand applied biology is worth noting. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:59, 18 May 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:00, 18 May 2019

Part of this article seems a bit petty. I'm planning to remove it on those grounds. If I'm making mistake please let me know. Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)

This should be discussed on the talk page before making any changes to the article, especially so CP's administrators can consider whatever you propose. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
Alright I will do that in future Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
You request is petty. Clearly, a website which strenuously advocates science/rationality, should have contributors who practice sound practices when it comes to nutritional science, exercise science and medical science. That is not too much to ask. See also: Atheism and unscientific medical practices
In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates evolutionary pseuodoscience which has contributors who fail to understand applied biology is worth noting. See also: Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese. Conservative (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2019 (EDT)