From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conservative (Talk | contribs) at 16:57, 18 May 2019. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Part of this article seems a bit petty. I'm planning to remove it on those grounds. If I'm making mistake please let me know. Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)

This should be discussed on the talk page before making any changes to the article, especially so CP's administrators can consider whatever you propose. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
Alright I will do that in future Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
You request is petty. Clearly, a website which strenuously advocates science/rationality, should have contributors who practice sound practices when it comes to nutritional science, exercise science and medical science. That is not too much to ask. In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates evolutionary pseuodoscience which has contributors who fail to understand applied biology is worth noting.Conservative (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2019 (EDT)