Difference between revisions of "Talk:Species"
From Conservapedia
DrSandstone (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Dogs were created by God, as were wolves. The relation between them is only because God willed it so. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 16:00, 2 September 2008 (EDT) | :Dogs were created by God, as were wolves. The relation between them is only because God willed it so. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 16:00, 2 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Tigers and lions are different species, but they can breed. Ability to reproduce does not define species. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 16:08, 2 September 2008 (EDT) | ::Tigers and lions are different species, but they can breed. Ability to reproduce does not define species. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 16:08, 2 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::They can, indeed, produce offspring, but such offspring are unable to produce more because they become infertile, same goes with donkeys and horses. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 16:11, 2 September 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:11, September 2, 2008
"A German Shepherd and a Beagle can mate, because they are different breeds within one species. " - There is no such thing a dog, because it's still a wolf? :) NewCrusader 15:53, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
- Dogs were created by God, as were wolves. The relation between them is only because God willed it so. JohnI 16:00, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
- Tigers and lions are different species, but they can breed. Ability to reproduce does not define species. -DrSandstone 16:08, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
- They can, indeed, produce offspring, but such offspring are unable to produce more because they become infertile, same goes with donkeys and horses. JohnI 16:11, 2 September 2008 (EDT)