Talk:Substantive due process

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AmesG (Talk | contribs) at 18:40, 6 May 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

"AmesG also had substantial input to this article: Substantive due process." --I am mightily inmpressed! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 03:55, 29 April 2007 (EDT)

Loving v Virginia

Why is there a long discussion of this case, when it didn't even involve substantive due process? One line of dicta does not justify it. RSchlafly 19:35, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

Because the line at the end was picked up by later decisions as a justification for SDP. Trust me. I'm going over this case now.-AmesGyo! 19:40, 6 May 2007 (EDT)