Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sun"
(Revision and dual-user provenance) |
(Revision--and high time) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{copied from|site=CreationWiki|user=[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup>|site user=Temlakos}} | {{copied from|site=CreationWiki|user=[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup>|site user=Temlakos}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Revision--and high time == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Everyone: | ||
| + | |||
| + | As you can see, I have revised this article extensively. I thank all those who contributed to the earlier version of the article. Some of the theories listed, though not what I would agree with, are nevertheless valuable as documents of people's thinking on the subject of the Sun and other subjects.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 13:50, 6 March 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:50, March 6, 2008
TmToulouse - Why did you revert my edit? I am simply trying to point out that "scientists speculate"? Mayeb I was too stupid to write it properly, but maybe you can do better, and retain Our Lord's presence in the story? After all, it is the most important thing in our heavens? NeverForget
- No, its not needed. Tmtoulouse 22:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- What do you mean? There's no mention WHATSOEVER of Our Lord on this critically important page? Why should we let the scientists simply get away unchallenged with everything they believe? I thought the point here was to allow differing viewpoints? NeverForget
Reading the phrase "its eight planets" makes me sad. Poor little Pluto. :( ColinRtalk 22:41, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Poor Pluto???? Poor astrologist!!!! All those planet maps and interactions all down the drawn! Tmtoulouse 22:42, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Interesting side note, one of my professors at Vandy wrote Is Pluto a Planet? and is very involved in the discussion among the IAU. If you have the time and money, it's supposed to be a pretty good read. ColinRtalk 22:46, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- I will check it out. Sorry about Vandy loosing to Georgetown tonight :). Tmtoulouse 22:47, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Tmtoulouse - why the problem with simply moving God to the top of this page? Can we not find a way to bring God into this article? It's not like the Sun isn't important or anything? NeverForget
- Its in the article. Tmtoulouse 22:52, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Is this more reasonable? NeverForget
Pluto is not a planet any more. That was dicided some months ago by an international board of astronomers. Regarding the article, I think it is in perfect conditions! Perhaps it's still a little too short but the text so far is good. Jks 12:30, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Revision and dual-user provenance
| ! | This article or part thereof was copied from CreationWiki but the copied text was originally written by me, TerryHTalk, (under the name Temlakos) and does not include alterations made by others on that site. | 
|
Revision--and high time
Everyone:
As you can see, I have revised this article extensively. I thank all those who contributed to the earlier version of the article. Some of the theories listed, though not what I would agree with, are nevertheless valuable as documents of people's thinking on the subject of the Sun and other subjects.--TerryHTalk 13:50, 6 March 2008 (EST)
