Difference between revisions of "Talk:War on Drugs"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(chasing a reply)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:::Why do you say it's not valid? [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 15:13, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Why do you say it's not valid? [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 15:13, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Any chance of a response? I had the courtesy of asking you for reasons and have waited over 16 hours for a reply... [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 07:45, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::Any chance of a response? I had the courtesy of asking you for reasons and have waited over 16 hours for a reply... [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 07:45, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::Over 21 hours without a response... Can we get 24? [[User:Dnotice|Dnotice]] 12:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:26, June 3, 2008

DNotice, the war on drugs today has nothing to do with Prohibition of alcohol back in the 1920's; the article should be about the war on drugs only. Further, when you are comparring both, it sounds too much like a drug supporter doing a proxy comparison of both in order to legalize drugs. Karajou 12:36, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

It's a valid comparator: the nanny state/big government (whatever you want to call it) is saying to people "We won't let you do that, even in the privacy in your own home, as we don't agree with it." By the way, what do you mean when you use the term "drug supporter"? Dnotice 12:44, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
"Durg supporter" is anyone who supports and encourages the recreational use of illegal drugs; and no, what you included is not a valid comparator. Karajou 14:25, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Why do you say it's not valid? Dnotice 15:13, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Any chance of a response? I had the courtesy of asking you for reasons and have waited over 16 hours for a reply... Dnotice 07:45, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
Over 21 hours without a response... Can we get 24? Dnotice 12:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)