Difference between revisions of "Talk:Welfare"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
''Welfare has been growing...''
 
''Welfare has been growing...''
 
It's also too simple. It is no longer called Welfare, and the concept has changed dramatically since its inception. I'm giving anyone who wants to look at it 1 day. After that, I'm giving it the scrubbing of its life. [[User:JohnGalt|JohnGalt]] 17:33, 30 November 2007 (EST)
 
It's also too simple. It is no longer called Welfare, and the concept has changed dramatically since its inception. I'm giving anyone who wants to look at it 1 day. After that, I'm giving it the scrubbing of its life. [[User:JohnGalt|JohnGalt]] 17:33, 30 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
==Image==
 +
Why's there a picture of a bank on an article about welfare? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 17:00, 30 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 17:00, 30 November 2008

On the Reference

Whoever added "Jackson" - needs to fully cite the source in a "references section". Just saying "Jackson, 2005" doesn't really explain anything - and therefore the reference is questionable.--IDuan 15:45, 22 November 2007 (EST)

Citations Needed

This entire article needs citations. Welfare has been growing... It's also too simple. It is no longer called Welfare, and the concept has changed dramatically since its inception. I'm giving anyone who wants to look at it 1 day. After that, I'm giving it the scrubbing of its life. JohnGalt 17:33, 30 November 2007 (EST)

Image

Why's there a picture of a bank on an article about welfare? HDCase 17:00, 30 November 2008 (EST)