Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia police"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
The cited page doesn't reference or support the idea of "secret police".  No factual basis.[[User:apjames|apjames]]
 
The cited page doesn't reference or support the idea of "secret police".  No factual basis.[[User:apjames|apjames]]
 +
 +
Ah, I see someone found a +1 Tin Foil Hat. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:19, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 02:19, March 24, 2008

Guess what I am going to ask. Do you have any evidence AT ALL to back up this page?--KimSell 13:48, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Come on. Seriously? Judging by the flurry of hilarious articles recenetly created by him, this guy has completely lost it. Also, should there be a mention of Conservapedia police, mentioning the likes of Karajou and Crocoite? His tenuous link to reality has finally been cut. Schoenberg 15:21, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Source please? For this page or any on this site, really. NoraReed 15:33, 27 February 2008 (EST)

This is getting ridiculous. I saw you make up this term on the main page Andy. You went from talking about the 'Wikipedia police' to saying, 'That deserves its own entry'. Based on...? MetcalfeM 15:44, 27 February 2008 (EST)

"They almost never have user names reflecting their real names"--well, with the amount of identity theft and perverts out there, isn't that what your supposed to do? Maestro 23:27, 27 February 2008 (EST) (Brian Katcher)

The cited page doesn't reference or support the idea of "secret police". No factual basis.apjames

Ah, I see someone found a +1 Tin Foil Hat. Barikada 22:19, 23 March 2008 (EDT)