Talk:Zach Johnson

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TK (Talk | contribs) at 21:22, April 9, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Prominent?

He is prominent among a new generation of Christian athletes - Where is this information from? Who else is on this list of prominent Christian athletes? Seems like an opinion/gossip line to me. Jrssr5 15:37, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Well, it doesn't to me, or to Andy. He is the winner of the Masters, therefore he is prominent. --~ TK MyTalk 15:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

How is it evidence of a "new generation"? There is nothing in the link to support that claim. --Cgday 16:40, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

It certainly shows that the idea of a new generation of Christian athletes exists.
WhatIsG0ing0n 16:41, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 :: it shows a individual has faith - it's says nothing at all about a generational trend. --Cgday 16:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)


  • Well, I am sorry if you don't agree about what is self-evident. --~ TK MyTalk 16:42, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
The point of an ecylopedia is not that something is "self-evident" but that well-sourced reference can be made for a claim. --Cgday 16:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
  • So, you can talk, but cannot look, and find the source? You like to edit, but not "do"? Or are you perhaps just a "concerned" citizen being vigilant? --~ TK MyTalk 16:47, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Who's going to look for a cite that they cannot add to the article because it's been protected? Crackertalk 16:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Well, I certainly don't expect you to, Rob, even though it has been explained many times, users can slap the copy they want to add here, on the talk page. But that isn't "good enough", I understand. In the meantime, I added the citation. ;-) Another non-issue made into a "issue". People have time to carp and complain, yet little time to actually create articles, that I do understand. --~ TK MyTalk 17:22, 9 April 2007 (EDT)