Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Solarsystem"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(text doesn't flow around it. it covers up text)
(Redlinks)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Solarsystem}}
 
 
This is some text around the page so that it is possible to see how the template flows around it.  This is only a test.  There is no real content in this talk page at this time.
 
This is some text around the page so that it is possible to see how the template flows around it.  This is only a test.  There is no real content in this talk page at this time.
 
== Section here ==
 
This is another section.
 
== Another section ==
 
This is yet another section.
 
  
 
== text doesn't flow around it.  it covers up text ==
 
== text doesn't flow around it.  it covers up text ==
  
text doesn't flow around it.  it covers up text [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
+
text doesn't flow around it.  it covers up text in solar system article and oort cloud article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
 +
: What browser are you using?  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 23:46, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
: For refrence, this is how this page renders for me [[:Image:Template_SolarSystem_Screenshot.PNG]] --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 23:50, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Z index ==
 +
 
 +
Good catch.  That could very well be the issue there.  It isn't properly handled by all browsers.  Shall we try it again? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 23:53, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== comets? ==
 +
 
 +
I don't want to mess up this great templete thing without asking first, but shouldn't comets be on the list as well?  Are they considered trans-neptunian by astronomers?  Since that is where they spend most of their time.  Of course, we only know of them when they are in the part of their orbit that is ''not'' trans-neptunian!  Thanks, [[User:Human|Human]] 12:29, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==Appearance==
 +
As the mere author of the current look of this template, could someone with greater powers than I please change the asterisks in the Natural Satellites section to nice round bullets? [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:56, 12 February 2008 (EST)
 +
:Done. And as you can see, the natural satellites are starting to fill in.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 16:17, 12 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::Thanks Terry.  It looks much better! [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 16:30, 12 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 
 +
==Redlinks==
 +
Hi Terry. I have noticed that in the template there are redlinks for "Gas Giant" and this is creating a load of "wanted pages" links. I think if you can change the link to "Gas giant" that should fix the problem. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 01:13, 5 December 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 06:13, December 5, 2008

This is some text around the page so that it is possible to see how the template flows around it. This is only a test. There is no real content in this talk page at this time.

text doesn't flow around it. it covers up text

text doesn't flow around it. it covers up text in solar system article and oort cloud article.Conservative 23:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

What browser are you using? --Mtur 23:46, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
For refrence, this is how this page renders for me Image:Template_SolarSystem_Screenshot.PNG --Mtur 23:50, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

Z index

Good catch. That could very well be the issue there. It isn't properly handled by all browsers. Shall we try it again? --Mtur 23:53, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

comets?

I don't want to mess up this great templete thing without asking first, but shouldn't comets be on the list as well? Are they considered trans-neptunian by astronomers? Since that is where they spend most of their time. Of course, we only know of them when they are in the part of their orbit that is not trans-neptunian! Thanks, Human 12:29, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

Appearance

As the mere author of the current look of this template, could someone with greater powers than I please change the asterisks in the Natural Satellites section to nice round bullets? BrianCo 15:56, 12 February 2008 (EST)

Done. And as you can see, the natural satellites are starting to fill in.--TerryHTalk 16:17, 12 February 2008 (EST)
Thanks Terry. It looks much better! BrianCo 16:30, 12 February 2008 (EST)

Redlinks

Hi Terry. I have noticed that in the template there are redlinks for "Gas Giant" and this is creating a load of "wanted pages" links. I think if you can change the link to "Gas giant" that should fix the problem. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 01:13, 5 December 2008 (EST)