Template talk:USstates
From Conservapedia
Test
This is just a test post to see if it will remove the redlinks on the wanted pages, by creating the talk page. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 01:31, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- Is there a problem? Unless a page has been deleted there shouldn't be any red links. BrianCo 02:25, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- I think what the problem is, is if you look at the 'wanted pages' you will see the first few are all templates. I think that is because the new template has a built-in link to the talk page for that template, which if it does not exist, creates a raft of redlinks, from each article using the template. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 02:31, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- Oh, I see what has happened. TerryH changed the navbox style to be like Wikipedia's so that it has "v.d.e" (view discuss edit) links. So the "discuss" points to the talk pages which largely never existed as there was nothing special to discuss about them. So yes, creating some blank text (even a space) will remove them from the wanted pages list. BrianCo 02:39, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- I have created a 'quick fix' so at least they do not clutter up the wanted items anymore. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 03:03, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- Oh, I see what has happened. TerryH changed the navbox style to be like Wikipedia's so that it has "v.d.e" (view discuss edit) links. So the "discuss" points to the talk pages which largely never existed as there was nothing special to discuss about them. So yes, creating some blank text (even a space) will remove them from the wanted pages list. BrianCo 02:39, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- I think what the problem is, is if you look at the 'wanted pages' you will see the first few are all templates. I think that is because the new template has a built-in link to the talk page for that template, which if it does not exist, creates a raft of redlinks, from each article using the template. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 02:31, 5 December 2008 (EST)
