Textual

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JeffersonDarcy (Talk | contribs) at 13:54, 26 April 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search
Part of the series on
U.S. Discrimination Law
Const.gif
Standards of Review

Rational basis review
Intermediate scrutiny
Strict scrutiny

Other Legal Theories

Substantive due process
State action doctrine

Defining Moments in Law

The 14th Amendment
Plessy v. Ferguson
Brown v. Board of Education
Loving v. Virginia
U.S. v. Virginia
Romer v. Evans
Lawrence v. Texas

Modalities of Constitutional Law

Textual
Responsive

Textualism is a legal theory that courts should rely on the plain meaning of the words in the Constitution and in other laws. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia is a prominent textualist. For a recent example of his view, see Zuni v Dept. of Education[1], where there appeared to be a difference between the intent of a statute and its plain meaning.
  1. http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/05-1508.html