Difference between revisions of "The Selfish Gene"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (recat.)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
== Altruism denial ==
 
== Altruism denial ==
The fundamental purpose of Dawkins' book is to account for one of the most serious contradictions to Darwinism, the existence of altruism in nature (see [[Counterexamples to Evolution]]).  To do so, he simply denies that altruism truly exists, and attempts to account for its perceived occurrence by reducing all animal behavior to selfishness, with increasingly twisted logic.  As critics noted, his work is extremely speculative and shy on evidence, but was glorified by atheists as it agreed with their worldview.  As such, ''The Selfish Gene'' has become lauded by the atheist Darwinist movement, but otherwise largely ignored.
+
The fundamental purpose of Dawkins' book is to account for one of the most serious contradictions to Darwinism, the existence of altruism in nature (see [[Counterexamples to Evolution]]).  To do so, he simply denies that altruism truly exists, and attempts to account for its perceived occurrence by attempting to explain seemingly altruistic behaviors as, instead, attempts to preserve other copies of an individual's genes in the population. For example, Dawkins argues that given a choice between saving the life of a sibling and a cousin, all other factors being equal, the individual in question is more likely to save the sibling because the sibling is more likely to share more genes.  As critics noted, his work is extremely speculative and shy on evidence, but was glorified by atheists as it agreed with their worldview.  As such, ''The Selfish Gene'' has become lauded by the atheist Darwinist movement, but otherwise largely ignored.
  
 
== Memes ==
 
== Memes ==
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
[[Category:Books]]
+
[[Category:Liberal Books]]
 +
[[Category:Richard Dawkins]]
  
 
{{evolution}}
 
{{evolution}}

Latest revision as of 02:43, March 26, 2017

The Selfish Gene is a pseudoscientific book on evolution by Richard Dawkins, published in 1976.

It builds upon the principal theory of George C. Williams's first book Adaptation and Natural Selection. Dawkins coined the term selfish gene as a way of expressing the gene-centered view of evolution, which holds that evolution is best viewed as acting on genes, and that selection at the level of organisms or populations almost never overrides selection based on genes. An organism is expected to evolve to maximize its inclusive fitness – the number of copies of its genes passed on globally (rather than by a particular individual). As a result, populations will tend towards an evolutionarily stable strategy.

Altruism denial

The fundamental purpose of Dawkins' book is to account for one of the most serious contradictions to Darwinism, the existence of altruism in nature (see Counterexamples to Evolution). To do so, he simply denies that altruism truly exists, and attempts to account for its perceived occurrence by attempting to explain seemingly altruistic behaviors as, instead, attempts to preserve other copies of an individual's genes in the population. For example, Dawkins argues that given a choice between saving the life of a sibling and a cousin, all other factors being equal, the individual in question is more likely to save the sibling because the sibling is more likely to share more genes. As critics noted, his work is extremely speculative and shy on evidence, but was glorified by atheists as it agreed with their worldview. As such, The Selfish Gene has become lauded by the atheist Darwinist movement, but otherwise largely ignored.

Memes

The book also coins the term meme for a unit of human cultural evolution analogous to the gene, suggesting that such "selfish" replication may also model human culture, in a different sense. Memes were Dawkins' attempt to provide a scientific-sounding basis for cultural relativism and atheistic denial of religion, by reducing all matters of faith to a matter of "memes." "Memetics" has since become a favorite area of study for militant atheists such as Daniel Dennett.