Difference between revisions of "Transcendental argument for the existence of God"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(See also)
(top: Spelling, grammar, and general fixes, typos fixed: unsuccesfully → unsuccessfully)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
'''Transcendental argument for the existence of God''' (TAG) is an argument for the existence of God which teaches that morality, science, and logic would be meaningless if there wasn't a God (see external link section below).<ref>[http://www.gotquestions.org/transcendental-argument.html What is the transcendental argument for the existence of God?]</ref>
 
'''Transcendental argument for the existence of God''' (TAG) is an argument for the existence of God which teaches that morality, science, and logic would be meaningless if there wasn't a God (see external link section below).<ref>[http://www.gotquestions.org/transcendental-argument.html What is the transcendental argument for the existence of God?]</ref>
  
[[Michael Martin]] came up with an argument called [[Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God]] (TANG) in which he unsuccesfully tried to counter the transcendental argument for the existence of God. Martin was criticized by the defenders of TAG for pulling out his 1994 scheduled debate with Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] (See: [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate]] and [[Greg Bahnsen and debate]]).<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref>
+
[[Michael Martin]] came up with an argument called [[Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God]] (TANG) in which he unsuccessfully tried to counter the transcendental argument for the existence of God. Martin was criticized by the defenders of TAG for pulling out his 1994 scheduled debate with Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] (See: [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate]] and [[Greg Bahnsen and debate]]).<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref>
  
 
Martin released his TANG argument in 1996 after Greg Bahnsen died in 1995.  
 
Martin released his TANG argument in 1996 after Greg Bahnsen died in 1995.  

Revision as of 13:40, July 12, 2016

Dr. Greg Bahnsen, a notable defender of TAG, became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to Michael Martin's cancellation of their scheduled debate.[1]

Transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG) is an argument for the existence of God which teaches that morality, science, and logic would be meaningless if there wasn't a God (see external link section below).[2]

Michael Martin came up with an argument called Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God (TANG) in which he unsuccessfully tried to counter the transcendental argument for the existence of God. Martin was criticized by the defenders of TAG for pulling out his 1994 scheduled debate with Dr. Greg Bahnsen (See: Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate and Greg Bahnsen and debate).[3]

Martin released his TANG argument in 1996 after Greg Bahnsen died in 1995.

See also

External links

Transcendental argument for the existence of God

Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God

Notes