United States v. Throckmorton

From Conservapedia

This is the current revision of United States v. Throckmorton as edited by Mr. Nationalist (Talk | contribs) at 20:56, July 16, 2021. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Jump to: navigation, search

In United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S/ 61 (1878), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "fraud vitiates every thing, and a judgment equally with a contract." Id. at 66.

This case is cited as authority that election fraud invalidates the reported outcome of an election.

v • d • e Election Fraud

Types of Election Fraud	Arizona audit • Ballot harvesting • Democrat election fraud • Georgia election fraud • Michigan election fraud • Pennsylvania election fraud • Wisconsin election fraud • Hammer and Scorecard • Ranked-choice voting

Individuals Fighting Election Fraud	Shiva Ayyadurai • Lauren Boebert • Jair Bolsonaro • Mark Brnovich • Patrick Byrne • Fernando Cerimedo • Rudy Giuliani • Louis Gohmert • Mike Lindell • John R. Lott • Peter Navarro • Ken Paxton • Sidney Powell • Donald Trump • Kelli Ward • Lin Wood

Election Integrity	Alternate Electors • Electoral Count Act • Election integrity • Judicial Watch • Look Ahead America • Objectors to Biden Electors • True the Vote • Florida election integrity

Groups Undermining Traditional Election Integrity	ACORN • Biden junta • Center for Tech and Civic Life • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative • CNN • CCP • Democratic National Committee • Dominion Voting Systems • NextGen America • Open Society Foundations • Pelosi Panel • Perkins Coie • Priorities USA • Quadrivium • Smartmatic • Transition Integrity Project •

Bills Undermining Election Integrity	For the People Act • John Lewis Voting Rights Act •

Court cases	Kelly v. Pennsylvania • United States v. Throckmorton • Burson v. Freeman • Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee •