Difference between revisions of "Universal Health Care"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Corrected spellings, corrected text to accurately reflect cited sources.)
(Current Practice and Effectiveness)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
An aspect of universal health care, emergency treatments, are accessible to all in the United States.  [[David Hogberg]]  wrote:
 
An aspect of universal health care, emergency treatments, are accessible to all in the United States.  [[David Hogberg]]  wrote:
 
:"... everyone in the U.S. can get care regardless of income. In 1986 the [[U.S. Congress]] passed the [[Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act]]. This requires [[emergency room]]s to treat any person who shows up seeking medical treatment, regardless of their ability to pay." [http://www.freemarketcure.com/singlepayermyths.php]
 
:"... everyone in the U.S. can get care regardless of income. In 1986 the [[U.S. Congress]] passed the [[Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act]]. This requires [[emergency room]]s to treat any person who shows up seeking medical treatment, regardless of their ability to pay." [http://www.freemarketcure.com/singlepayermyths.php]
 +
 +
Free Market Health Care is paradoxical. Healthy people are the highest earners.  Healthy people can afford to pay for medical treatment but do not need it.  Less healthy people need more treatment but can pay less.  The most unfortunate are those born with chronic illnesses or disabilities.  Such patients may in the worst cases never in their lives earn the money they need to pay for medical treatment.  Universal Health Care is seen as compassionate.  It looks after those who through no fault of their own cannot look after themselves.
  
 
Most developed countries have instituted various types of universal health care, though most [[conservatives]] say with inadequate results (lengthy waiting times, for example). Cuba is another country with  woefully inadequate socialized health care. In Canada, it is illegal for a doctor to "bill" a patient, but one doctor found many people suffering while waiting months or years for treatment. He sued the government, appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, and won (see Dr. [[Jacques Chaoulli]]).
 
Most developed countries have instituted various types of universal health care, though most [[conservatives]] say with inadequate results (lengthy waiting times, for example). Cuba is another country with  woefully inadequate socialized health care. In Canada, it is illegal for a doctor to "bill" a patient, but one doctor found many people suffering while waiting months or years for treatment. He sued the government, appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, and won (see Dr. [[Jacques Chaoulli]]).

Revision as of 19:33, April 2, 2008

Universal health care (UHC) can refer to things in two distinct categories: (1) methods of paying for health care, such as health insurance; and (2) systems of providing patients with services, prescriptions, and the like. Some politicians and activists blur the distinction.

There are several different ways of paying for health care, including private insurance, government-supplied insurance, single payer health insurance or health savings accounts.

The United States has a mixture of public and private insurance programs. [2] Additionally, some hospitals provide free care to those who cannot pay (usually they bill you, and if you don't pay they write off the debt).

Ways to Pay for Universal Health Care

There are many different types of care which fall under the term universal health care [1]. Some of these systems are highlighted here:

  • Single-payer health care is a system in which one entity pays for the health care of the entire population (see single-payer system). This entity is traditionally the federal or national government, and the system is paid for through taxes. Canada, Cuba and North Korea are the only three countries using this system.
  • Multi-payer health care is similar to the single-payer system, except that individuals may also choose to purchase private insurance. The United Kingdom is an example of this, with a National Health Service system available to all residents, which is paid for through a National Insurance scheme plus general taxation. People are, however, free to purchase private insurance and be treated privately if they so wish. France, Germany, Japan, Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands also use the multi-payer system.[2]
  • Tax Credits can be used to provide uninsured individuals with a discount in their taxes to use towards paying for health care.
  • Managed competition is a system which allows employers to join health care purchasing cooperatives. These cooperatives negotiate with private insurance providers to provide employees with a number of health options. The premiums are paid for in large part by the employer, and all purchasers pay the same price, regardless of their current health situation.

Ways to Administer Universal Health Care

There are essentially only two ways to administer health care: privately or through the state. Health care in most countries is administered largely if not solely by private organizations, but some proponents of universal health care advocate socialized medicine, in which health care is primarily or soley administered and paid for by the state. Sometimes the terms socialized medicine and universal health care are used interchangeably, but this is not technically correct, as UHC can include methods other than socialized medicine.[3][4]

Current Practice and Effectiveness

An aspect of universal health care, emergency treatments, are accessible to all in the United States. David Hogberg wrote:

"... everyone in the U.S. can get care regardless of income. In 1986 the U.S. Congress passed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. This requires emergency rooms to treat any person who shows up seeking medical treatment, regardless of their ability to pay." [3]

Free Market Health Care is paradoxical. Healthy people are the highest earners. Healthy people can afford to pay for medical treatment but do not need it. Less healthy people need more treatment but can pay less. The most unfortunate are those born with chronic illnesses or disabilities. Such patients may in the worst cases never in their lives earn the money they need to pay for medical treatment. Universal Health Care is seen as compassionate. It looks after those who through no fault of their own cannot look after themselves.

Most developed countries have instituted various types of universal health care, though most conservatives say with inadequate results (lengthy waiting times, for example). Cuba is another country with woefully inadequate socialized health care. In Canada, it is illegal for a doctor to "bill" a patient, but one doctor found many people suffering while waiting months or years for treatment. He sued the government, appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, and won (see Dr. Jacques Chaoulli).

France, Germany, Japan, Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands also use the multi-payer system in a style called shared responsibility. Under this scheme workers and employers are required to pay into private, non-profit, government-regulated insurance funds. The government covers the cost of the low- and no-income citizens. These insurance funds negotiate strict cost controls with the government and health care providers to keep out-of-pocket costs from skyrocketing. Private insurance can be purchased on top of the insurance fund, to pay for premium services.[2]

The World Health Organization rates France highest of all countries), though it is having trouble keeping costs in line. Similar results are found in other shared responsibility systems.[5]

Proponents of Universal Health Care

  • The American Medical Student Association [4] is a proponent of single-payer health insurance.
  • The Universal Health Care Action Network (UHCAN) [5] is an organization which promotes universal health care in general.

Opponents of Universal Health Care

Conservatives and libertarians believe that, in general, the more government control over health care, the worse it gets. For example, they argue that the U.S. produces the most new drugs and techniques because the largely unhindered free market system provides incentives for innovation and efficiency. Some conservatives and most libertarians argue that there could be even fewer restrictions and regulations, thereby improving health care even further.

  • The Cato Institute [6] is in favor of free market solutions to health care, and advocates health savings accounts in combination with high-deductible private insurance plans.

See Also

References

  1. American Medical Student Association, Theoretical Models for Delivering Health Care [1]
  2. 2.0 2.1 Hill, Stephen, Contra Costa Times, "Single payer not only way for universal health care
  3. American Medical Student AssociationTheoretical Models for Delivering Universal Health Care: An analysis of important concepts.
  4. MedicineNet.com MedTerms Dictionary
  5. Christian Science Monitor, French health system gets surgery.