User:CSGuy

Things m This user knows how to use "Show preview". This user supports the Flying Spaghetti Monster as the rightful leader of Conservapedia. A This user is an atheist. C This user is a C coder. code This user is a coder. comp-6 All Teh Internets Are Belong to This User This user writes LaTeX. This user likes Macs. This user thinks that evolution explains the origin of species. This user thinks that the Big Bang explains the origin of the Universe. Science This user would like to see changes to the evolution article expanding the scientific viewpoint. This user does not care about your religious beliefs, so long as they aren't forced on them. This user believes the bible is just another book This user is not a Christian, but respects the teachings of Jesus Christ. This user has Interests other than Conservapedia gk This user is a geek. This user went to a public school, and was never homeschooled. This user believes in equal rights for gay people This user thinks cows are tasty.

I am an atheist, an agnostic, or just nonreligious. Choose whichever you want; I really don't care. I don't vote. If you made me place a name on the few political beliefs I hold, it would probably be "liberal." Call me liberal if you want; I really don't care. I accept evolution as fact. I do not feel obligated to answer any questions placed on my talk page.

I will not try to force my beliefs on others. I will, however, remove crap. Do not try to force your beliefs on me. Feel free to remove crap I add.

No, I will not argue any of this.

It is my opinion that many of the major articles here (particular examples: Atheism, Homosexuality, Bias in Wikipedia, all of the liberal- and atheist-bashing articles) are crap and should be thrown out or completely rewritten.

My usual disclaimers: If I edit a talk page, I will not feel obligated to respond to any responses. If I want to answer, I will, if I don't, I won't.

A link: http://punditkitchen.com/2008/09/26/political-pictures-abraham-lincoln-illinois-senator/ (The caption isn't quite correct, but the point is still valid.)