Difference between revisions of "User:Danq"
From Conservapedia
(Replacing page with 'I was really unhappy with the way I was treated here. Feel free to delete my account.') |
(i'm back, read my apology) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I | + | '''APOLOGY''' |
| + | |||
| + | I overreacted a bit over a "quality edits only" situation and left Conservapedia, leaving a message that I wasn't happy with the site. | ||
| + | The reason I did this was because I unfairly grouped this site together with problems on some other sites at the time (Wikipedia included). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Conservapedia is run by a great group of people, and has some good information you won't find elsewhere. It's a great source of information for fiscal and moral conservatism of all varieties, as well as Creationism and the Great Flood. I shouldn't have overreacted about a small incident. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry and thank you, | ||
| + | |||
| + | -danq ("redblade7") | ||
Revision as of 00:55, January 28, 2009
APOLOGY
I overreacted a bit over a "quality edits only" situation and left Conservapedia, leaving a message that I wasn't happy with the site. The reason I did this was because I unfairly grouped this site together with problems on some other sites at the time (Wikipedia included).
Conservapedia is run by a great group of people, and has some good information you won't find elsewhere. It's a great source of information for fiscal and moral conservatism of all varieties, as well as Creationism and the Great Flood. I shouldn't have overreacted about a small incident.
Sorry and thank you,
-danq ("redblade7")
