User:GregG/Early voting and voter ID

From Conservapedia
< User:GregG
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GregG (Talk | contribs) at 09:31, 24 December 2012. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

In light of this edit made by Mr. Schlafly, I want to examine whether early voting laws were passed by liberals to avoid the strictures of voter ID legislation.

(Classification of states as strict/non-strict photo/non-photo ID is from [1]

Strict Photo ID

In effect in 2012


HB 244 in the 2005-06 session introduced both voter ID and no-excuse absentee balloting. The Georgia House passed HB 224 along party lines: Republicans voting yes, Democrats voting no, with the following exceptions: Johnny Floyd (R-147th), Mark Hatfield (R-177th), Penny Houston (R-170th) voted No; Keith Heard (D-114th), Greg Morris (D-155th) voted Yes.

Attorneys for the state used the existence of no-excuse absentee voting (without having to present photo ID) as an argument that no eligible voters would be disenfranchised as a result of voter ID.[1]



As implemented under the S.A.F.E. Act, Kansas's voter ID system requires absentee and early voters to produce identification.[2] Kris Kobach, the main proponent of the S.A.F.E. Act, bragged about its comprehensiveness in a Wall Street Journal editorial.[3]


Tennessee does not have no-excuse absentee voting nor early voting.[4]


  1. See generally Response in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Common Cause/Georgia v. Billups, available at
  3. Kobach, Kris W., "The Case for Voter ID," The Wall Street Journal, May 23, 2011