Difference between revisions of "User:HelpJazz"
From Conservapedia
m ("Get a grip on yourself and start contributing to this encyclopaedia, or clear off.") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{userboxtop|HelpJazz}} | {{userboxtop|HelpJazz}} | ||
<!--{{User Vandalized|9}}--> | <!--{{User Vandalized|9}}--> | ||
− | {{Userbox|#6ef7a7|#c5fcdc|3,000|This user has made over | + | {{Userbox|#6ef7a7|#c5fcdc|3,000|This user has made over 5,000 edits to Conservapedia}} |
{{Template:User Libertarian}} | {{Template:User Libertarian}} | ||
{{User political compass|5.00|-2.92}} | {{User political compass|5.00|-2.92}} |
Revision as of 21:03, September 28, 2008
HelpJazz
|
My Editing Philosophy
- Noncontroversial edits are usually ok
- I will always follow the Guidelines and Commandments
- I won't change work from the editors who are never wrong, unless I really, really, really know what I am doing
- I won't edit or comment on essay pages; they are supposed to be opinion
- Corollary 1: I will petition for mainspace opinion pieces to be moved to the essay space
- Corollary 2: I will realize that certain main space opinion pieces... won't be moved to the essay space
- I will point out and correct when an article is unencyclopedic, but will back down when defending my action is futile
- I will point out and correct when an article does not follow the Guidelines or Commandments, but will back down when defending my action is futile
- I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
- I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words
- There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people
- I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself)
- I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
- I will never block someone for violating the 90/10 rule
- I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
- I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
- I will never block someone for referring to or showing up on That Which Shall Not Be Named (and no, I can't tell you what it is, and no, I can not give you any hints)
- If a block is properly given, then no apology should ever be needed as an unblocking condition
- I will not unblock myself if blocked by a sysop
Some who think they are more rational than me may say that I'm a wimp for backing down. I say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result.
About Me
- I am a libertarian, and very much so!
- Actually, I'm a social and economic conservative. The difference between me and most conservatives is not what I believe, but where I think the government should step in for my beliefs.
- Feel free to ask me about my positions. I love talking politics with open-minded, rational people
- I (still) support Ron Paul for Republican Presidential nominee
- I'm currently undecided as to whom I will vote for, but I will never vote for Obama, Nader, any Green Party candidate, or any left-wing candidates (aka Socialist party and those other wingnuts). The only wingnut I might vote for is Bob Barr, but from what little I know about him, he's kind of a "blah" candidate.
- In 2008 I graduated from Bucknell University with a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering
- I have a pretty strong background in fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics, etc. etc.
- I was at one point pursuing a minor in political science
- I have a good working base of political science, political theory and international politics
- I also have taken courses in economics, logic, and probability
Subs: /chemredlinks, /Contest, /refs, /workspace, /chemeng, /templates, /irg