Gentlemen at the other side are discussing the creation of a real, serious conservative encyclopedia, not one... like this.
Here is a typical response: "I second that motion. I can imagine a decent conservative encyclopedia, but Conservapedia aint it. The main reason I read Conservapedia is to understand how conservatives think, but I doubt Andy's personal blog is representative of broader conservativism. Agreed, we can build a better one."
The discussion is going on on their WIGO page. Feel free to contribute. Ideally, Conservapedia should fill that role, but it has taken a not very conservative direction, unfortunately.