Difference between revisions of "User:Newton"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{User Life begins|conception}} | {{User Life begins|conception}} | ||
{{User CPLeader|ASchlafly}} | {{User CPLeader|ASchlafly}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
I'm a '''Christian''' and a '''Conservative''' hailing from the [[United Kingdom]]. I've been using the Internet for a long time, and recently stumbled upon the Wikipedia article "Homosexual Agenda." This article describes a "conspiracy theory." It is completely biased. Becoming increasingly skeptical of Wikipedia's biased approach, I began to read through a whole series of articles. After a whole night of reading article after article, I couldn't help but realise: '''Wikipedia is pro-atheist, pro-homosexual, pro-liberal, pro-secularism, suicide-apologising and seriously biased.''' I found Conservapedia by chance, googling "Wikpedia's Liberal Bias." After reading a host of articles, I really sympathised with the goal of the project and feel that its worthy of my online time to develop. | I'm a '''Christian''' and a '''Conservative''' hailing from the [[United Kingdom]]. I've been using the Internet for a long time, and recently stumbled upon the Wikipedia article "Homosexual Agenda." This article describes a "conspiracy theory." It is completely biased. Becoming increasingly skeptical of Wikipedia's biased approach, I began to read through a whole series of articles. After a whole night of reading article after article, I couldn't help but realise: '''Wikipedia is pro-atheist, pro-homosexual, pro-liberal, pro-secularism, suicide-apologising and seriously biased.''' I found Conservapedia by chance, googling "Wikpedia's Liberal Bias." After reading a host of articles, I really sympathised with the goal of the project and feel that its worthy of my online time to develop. |
Revision as of 16:54, March 26, 2010
|
I'm a Christian and a Conservative hailing from the United Kingdom. I've been using the Internet for a long time, and recently stumbled upon the Wikipedia article "Homosexual Agenda." This article describes a "conspiracy theory." It is completely biased. Becoming increasingly skeptical of Wikipedia's biased approach, I began to read through a whole series of articles. After a whole night of reading article after article, I couldn't help but realise: Wikipedia is pro-atheist, pro-homosexual, pro-liberal, pro-secularism, suicide-apologising and seriously biased. I found Conservapedia by chance, googling "Wikpedia's Liberal Bias." After reading a host of articles, I really sympathised with the goal of the project and feel that its worthy of my online time to develop.
I believe that the political system of the United Kingdom is horribly liberal, and that all three of our main parties are liberal. I'd argue that our "Conservative Party" are about as liberal as the Democrats in America, and that the Labour Party (currently in government) and that the Liberal Democrats are both more liberal than the Democrats.
I've been brought up a Christian. My family were originally members of the Church of England, but after they began to accept female clergy in the 1990s, my father could no longer support them. "Jesus chose twelve male disciplines, and that's enough for me," he once told me. Tragically, there isn't truly a local church which represents our beliefs, and so we still attend our local (Church of England) church (with only male clergy), and my father teaches us every Sunday afternoon.