Difference between revisions of "User:TK"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;" class="metadata"> | <div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;" class="metadata"> | ||
<span id="coordinates">'''{{CURRENTDAYNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}'''</span> | <span id="coordinates">'''{{CURRENTDAYNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}'''</span> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | {|style="border:0px solid white; background-color:transparent;" | |
− | + | |- valign=center | |
− | < | + | | |
+ | {|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:5px solid red; background-color:#191983;" | ||
+ | |<font color=white><b>Welcome To TK's User Page. I am An Administrator Of Conservapedia. Please Post Any Messages On My Talk Page.<br><small>You Can IM @ Terry.92270 on Google Chat.<br /> | ||
+ | Email Through the Wiki Using the Link to the Left, or at '''tfk92270@hotmail.com''', If You Need Help Or Assistance.</small> | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | ''' | + | {{cquote|'''"Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that...Fox News" <small>-- Denny Crane</small>'''}} |
+ | {{cquote|'''It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But the half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor. <small>- [http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/27536.html Neil Gaiman]</small>}}''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ''' | + | '''My Wikipedia Talk Page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TK-CP here]. Do not contact me there about CP.'''<br /> |
− | ''' | + | '''[[User:TK/Sarah Palin|Sarah Palin Facts]]''' |
− | + | __NOTOC__ | |
− | + | {{Userboxtop|User TK}} | |
− | + | {{Userbox|white|yellow|25,000|This user has made over 25,000 edits to Conservapedia}} | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | | | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | {{Userboxtop|User TK | + | |
− | {{Userbox|white|yellow| | + | |
{{User CPLeader|[[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]}} | {{User CPLeader|[[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]}} | ||
{{User Sysop}} | {{User Sysop}} | ||
Line 36: | Line 25: | ||
{{User Christian1}} | {{User Christian1}} | ||
{{User Denny}} | {{User Denny}} | ||
− | {{User | + | {{User Catholic}} |
{{User caffeine}} | {{User caffeine}} | ||
− | {{Userbox |border-c=#000 | border-s=1 |id-c=#000 |info-c=#000 |info-s=8 |info-fc=lightblue |id=[[Image:Putin2.jpg|50px]] |info=<center> Putin! is watching | + | {{Userbox |border-c=#000 | border-s=1 |id-c=#000 |info-c=#000 |info-s=8 |info-fc=lightblue |id=[[Image:Putin2.jpg|50px]] |info=<center> Putin(!) is watching YOU ... always watching.</center>}} |
{{Userboxbottom}} | {{Userboxbottom}} | ||
<br /><br /> | <br /><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
+ | == '''Over 6,000 pages watched ''not counting talk pages''.''' == | ||
+ | '''I have been editing Conservapedia since March 13, 2007.''' | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | == '''My Blocking Policy:''' == | ||
− | + | '''True wikis have simple, clear rules. Otherwise it is a mobocracy and Conservapedia and its Founder has explicitly rejected mob rule, and has Administrators to suggest/implement its policies.''' | |
+ | '''''A person who stops by merely to ridicule and denigrate others scholarly efforts, without at least trying to make positive contributions to this project, cannot have a "point" other than to disrupt and waste the time of sincere contributors and Administrators.''''' | ||
− | ---- | + | '''If a person comes to Conservapedia knowing full well it is a conservative/Christian friendly wiki-encyclopedia, and is a liberal, the question is why? If the answer is they support Andy Schlafly's idea of intellectual freedom, of a Conservative & Christian-friendly alternative to the decidedly left-of-center, editor dominated Wikipedia, that's great! All voices should be represented on the Net. But if their intentions are merely to argue and dispute Conservative or Christian points of view, that becomes a form of vandalism, inasmuch as it is a great time waster and distraction for those who genuinely want to contribute, and build this encyclopedia.''' |
− | + | '''Those who obsessively create new user names, only to argue against our values, and do not make an effort to substantially contribute, are actually terrorists of the Internet kind. What other reason would they have to stick around, arguing and wasting our time? Any board or wiki has the absolute right of free association.''' | |
+ | '''I am not for truncating free speech automatically, but after days or weeks of disputing everything, knowing you are not going to change CP into Wikipedia's more liberal world-view, or have CP adopt Wikipedia's member conventions, a person's efforts then cross over into something more; "Internet Terrorism". CP has an owner, it is his right to have whatever viewpoint he wants. If people agree, with even a part, they stick around and help build this place. If they don't, what other reason, other than being obstinate or having malicious intent, could they have? Disagreement is fine, debate is good. But where does it end, and the ability of like-minded individuals to associate with those they agree with, without argument without end begin?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''So if you find yourself blocked by me, please re-read this. If after doing so you feel you have made positive, non-talk edits and article improvements, email me using the link to the left, or the information at the top of this page. ''Don't expect an answer if I check and find no such positive contributions''.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[User:TK/Sandbox3|IP range block list]]<br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | *'''''Read about "Reconstructing American History" [http://newt.org/Portals/0/Capitol%20Visitor%20Center%20Report_.pdf here.]''''' | ||
+ | ==[[User:TK/Sandbox|Religion: What Do I Believe?]] == | ||
:I would rather see a sermon, than hear one any day. | :I would rather see a sermon, than hear one any day. | ||
:I would rather that one should walk with me, than merely show the way. | :I would rather that one should walk with me, than merely show the way. | ||
Line 58: | Line 61: | ||
== [[User:TK/SandboxCat|Category Discussion]] == | == [[User:TK/SandboxCat|Category Discussion]] == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == '''PORK BULGOGI''' == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Total Time: 40 Minutes | ||
+ | This is really good. Boston butt is also called pork shoulder roast. It is the cut that includes the shoulder blade, can be bone it or boneless. This was a very popular item. | ||
+ | |||
+ | RECIPE INGREDIENTS | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1 Boston butt pork roast, sliced wafer thin | ||
+ | 4 tablespoons soy sauce | ||
+ | 2 tablespoons sugar | ||
+ | 2 tablespoons sesame oil | ||
+ | 1/4 teaspoon ground black pepper | ||
+ | 6 cloves garlic, crushed | ||
+ | 2 teaspoons freshly grated ginger | ||
+ | 2 tablespoons sake or dry sherry | ||
+ | 2 tablespoons red pepper flakes or to taste | ||
+ | 2 white onions, quartered into 8ths | ||
+ | 2 Green Bell Peppers, cut into 1/2 inch strips | ||
+ | toasted sesame seeds to sprinkle over the meat for garnish | ||
+ | peanut oil-for frying | ||
+ | |||
+ | DIRECTIONS | ||
+ | Mix all ingredients except peanut oil and toasted sesame seeds. Set aside for a few minutes to marinate. Heat oil in wok or large skillet. Heat oil, add pork and marinade mixture and stir fry until the meat is no longer pink. I usually do it in three batches and it takes about 7-8 minute per batch. When it is all cooked, return all of it to the skillet or wok, cover and let steam for a few more minutes. Serve with steamed medium grain rice or fried rice. Garnish with toasted sesame seeds. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: In warm weather and with a small mesh grill, they can be grilled. A little more work but even better. Keep turning and do not allow them to brown on the grill. | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[User:TK/Sandbox2|Misc]]Balloon!<br> | [[User:TK/Sandbox2|Misc]]Balloon!<br> | ||
Line 86: | Line 117: | ||
*Top 100 articles at Conservapedia [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=100&offset=0 Top 100]. | *Top 100 articles at Conservapedia [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=100&offset=0 Top 100]. | ||
− | *Top 200 articles at Conservapedia [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=200&offset=0 Top 200]. | + | *Top 200 articles at Conservapedia [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=200&offset=0 Top 200].<br /> |
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | *20:32, 11 January 2010 Human (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:TK from (none) to Sysops (''Mostly harmless moron who has no idea how we operate. He will still fail to get it.'') <!-- [http://ra tio nalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=Human&page=User%3ATK&year=&month=-1] --> | ||
+ | *04:44, 28 January 2010 Wodewick (Talk | contribs) blocked TK (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 7889231 seconds (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) (Just think of it as me oversighting all your edits for the next three months) | ||
+ | [[Category:Catholic Conservapedians]] | ||
<div style="float:left; width: 15em; padding: 0 1em; margin: 1em 0 1em 1em; border-left: solid #888888 1px; background-color: #FFFFFF;"> | <div style="float:left; width: 15em; padding: 0 1em; margin: 1em 0 1em 1em; border-left: solid #888888 1px; background-color: #FFFFFF;"> | ||
Line 130: | Line 165: | ||
[[User:Jallen/userboxes]] | [[User:Jallen/userboxes]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Conservapedia Administrators]] |
Revision as of 14:20, August 15, 2010
Over 6,000 pages watched not counting talk pages.I have been editing Conservapedia since March 13, 2007.
My Blocking Policy:True wikis have simple, clear rules. Otherwise it is a mobocracy and Conservapedia and its Founder has explicitly rejected mob rule, and has Administrators to suggest/implement its policies. A person who stops by merely to ridicule and denigrate others scholarly efforts, without at least trying to make positive contributions to this project, cannot have a "point" other than to disrupt and waste the time of sincere contributors and Administrators. If a person comes to Conservapedia knowing full well it is a conservative/Christian friendly wiki-encyclopedia, and is a liberal, the question is why? If the answer is they support Andy Schlafly's idea of intellectual freedom, of a Conservative & Christian-friendly alternative to the decidedly left-of-center, editor dominated Wikipedia, that's great! All voices should be represented on the Net. But if their intentions are merely to argue and dispute Conservative or Christian points of view, that becomes a form of vandalism, inasmuch as it is a great time waster and distraction for those who genuinely want to contribute, and build this encyclopedia. Those who obsessively create new user names, only to argue against our values, and do not make an effort to substantially contribute, are actually terrorists of the Internet kind. What other reason would they have to stick around, arguing and wasting our time? Any board or wiki has the absolute right of free association. I am not for truncating free speech automatically, but after days or weeks of disputing everything, knowing you are not going to change CP into Wikipedia's more liberal world-view, or have CP adopt Wikipedia's member conventions, a person's efforts then cross over into something more; "Internet Terrorism". CP has an owner, it is his right to have whatever viewpoint he wants. If people agree, with even a part, they stick around and help build this place. If they don't, what other reason, other than being obstinate or having malicious intent, could they have? Disagreement is fine, debate is good. But where does it end, and the ability of like-minded individuals to associate with those they agree with, without argument without end begin? So if you find yourself blocked by me, please re-read this. If after doing so you feel you have made positive, non-talk edits and article improvements, email me using the link to the left, or the information at the top of this page. Don't expect an answer if I check and find no such positive contributions.
Religion: What Do I Believe?
Category DiscussionPORK BULGOGITotal Time: 40 Minutes This is really good. Boston butt is also called pork shoulder roast. It is the cut that includes the shoulder blade, can be bone it or boneless. This was a very popular item. RECIPE INGREDIENTS 1 Boston butt pork roast, sliced wafer thin 4 tablespoons soy sauce 2 tablespoons sugar 2 tablespoons sesame oil 1/4 teaspoon ground black pepper 6 cloves garlic, crushed 2 teaspoons freshly grated ginger 2 tablespoons sake or dry sherry 2 tablespoons red pepper flakes or to taste 2 white onions, quartered into 8ths 2 Green Bell Peppers, cut into 1/2 inch strips toasted sesame seeds to sprinkle over the meat for garnish peanut oil-for frying DIRECTIONS Mix all ingredients except peanut oil and toasted sesame seeds. Set aside for a few minutes to marinate. Heat oil in wok or large skillet. Heat oil, add pork and marinade mixture and stir fry until the meat is no longer pink. I usually do it in three batches and it takes about 7-8 minute per batch. When it is all cooked, return all of it to the skillet or wok, cover and let steam for a few more minutes. Serve with steamed medium grain rice or fried rice. Garnish with toasted sesame seeds. Note: In warm weather and with a small mesh grill, they can be grilled. A little more work but even better. Keep turning and do not allow them to brown on the grill.
ContestTK's November Contest Stats
Alexa and board stats
Uploaded files: 25,143 Number of users: 75,634 Sysop count: 30 Current Version: 1.24.2 Page revision number: 805831 Language: en
|