Difference between revisions of "User:TsarNicholas"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: I'm confused. I don't think I re-added anything that you removed.. I removed a reference cited to unknownnews.org as POV, and I changed STIs to STDs because the latter is more frequently ...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm confused.  I don't think I re-added anything that you removed.. I removed a reference cited to unknownnews.org as POV, and I changed STIs to STDs because the latter is more frequently used.  Can you explain what you mean?
+
I'm confused.  I don't think I re-added anything that you removed.. I removed a reference cited to unknownnews.org as POV, and I changed STIs to STDs because the latter is more frequently used.  Can you explain what you mean?--[[User:CastleVania|Lorrie]] 12:45, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
I think I see what happened now.  I meant to remove the section on "criticized the bush administration... etc etc" ENTIRELY, and you just changed the section.  I didn't realize that the section was also lower in the article in my edit, so when I reverted I inadvertently included the earlier version without your edits.  I meant to delete it altogether, because I think we both agree that it's POV.  --[[User:CastleVania|Lorrie]] 12:45, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:45, May 30, 2007

I'm confused. I don't think I re-added anything that you removed.. I removed a reference cited to unknownnews.org as POV, and I changed STIs to STDs because the latter is more frequently used. Can you explain what you mean?--Lorrie 12:45, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

I think I see what happened now. I meant to remove the section on "criticized the bush administration... etc etc" ENTIRELY, and you just changed the section. I didn't realize that the section was also lower in the article in my edit, so when I reverted I inadvertently included the earlier version without your edits. I meant to delete it altogether, because I think we both agree that it's POV. --Lorrie 12:45, 30 May 2007 (EDT)