User talk:Amyz

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of User talk:Amyz as edited by HenryS (Talk | contribs) at 20:22, June 12, 2007. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Don't write about future events as if they have already happened (Iraq). And if you come back, please provide references for your changes to Japan. --Ed Poor 18:26, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Amyz, much of your work is extremely interesting; to add further weight to your inclusions, could you begin supplying some cites? This edit, for example, [1] with a citation would do wonders for everybody's credibility, yours and the the projects as well. Thank you. RobS 20:21, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Hey there, Amyz. FYI, you don't need to sign your posts with ~~~~ in an edit summary. Thanks, and welcome! --Hojimachongtalk 17:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)

Very nice edits on the IDF.Bohdan

Confederate States of America

Sorry, but the CSA article is not going to be used to push the conspiratorial "Southern Strategy". RobS 17:22, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

Don't worry

about it. The main issue with The South is that there is no direction with it right now, as it's a relatively robust topic and could go in a lot of directions. Don't feel bad about your CSA edits, I saw that and thought it was a shame the whole thing got reverted, instead of just selectively editing out what they didn't like and then discussing it.

But yes, I'm an Okie so I consider myself a southerner, although I am a northern transplant. :) --Colest 15:34, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

Most of the CSA material is probably good; however all the Goldwater/Reagan etc. stuff has to come out. RobS 15:44, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

Causes of WWI

I have responded. This is interesting. Bohdan 15:03, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Could I convince you to write an article on the causes of WWI, or expand our article on WWI, as you seem quite knowledgeable about it? Bohdan 16:22, 12 June 2007 (EDT)