User talk:Aschlafly

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other trolling content at Conservapedia:User complaints. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.

Contents

Topic ban

Please impose a topic ban on User:Conservative's foreign policy and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 primary election season. His deliberate CP:Trolling, "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions" occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters.

User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in politics, and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines.

I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his neocon racist content to his heart's content. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"
Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. Conservative (talk) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)
I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. Conservative (talk) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)
(ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing "neocon racist content" to Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Off topic. We are not talking about your atheism content or anything else
And people like my content - especially my atheism article which has the highest page view count article on the website. My articles on homosexuality are very popular too. Conservative (talk) 17:57, December 28, 2023 (EST)

And just because you throw out a spurious and gossipy allegation about me, it does not obligate me to respond. Conservative (talk) 18:00, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Let's examine this edit today User:Conservative calls "motivational": "The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...". The "Eastern Bloc" was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the "Eastern Bloc" - communism - was defeated by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another Russophobic cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information.

One can only assume User:Conservative is "motivated" by the same racial fear and disdain for the "Slavic hordes" of Eastern Europe that his sources broadcast.RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Non-responsive
If you have a good case, feel free to create a counteressay. Andy likes content - not talk, talk, talk, talk. Godspeed. Conservative (talk) 18:18, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Your challenges to create counteressays violates the clause of "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users". Your challenges have been answered many times, yet you re-employ that argument.
"Counteressays" would "occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users" in spurious arguments. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:28, December 28, 2023 (EST)
Furthermore, this is precisely why I make this appeal to Andy - your maliciously motivated trolling is an impediment to my creation of content. And your racist, neocon screeds nobody should consider conservative, or acceptable "content" for Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:37, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Conservapedia Essay space should not be a platform for Liberal fascism, and that is all User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)

Andy, Please instruct the trolling Admin to cease and desist. Thank you. [1] RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 15:33, February 27, 2024 (EST)

Can you explain this?

Can you explain what happened with User:BHathorn as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates?

It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.

I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. Conservative (talk) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. Conservative (talk) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)
I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)
P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)
It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into User:BHathorn's account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA. I am awaiting hearing a reply from User:BHathorn. Conservative (talk) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I unblocked User:BHathorn. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. Conservative (talk) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Re: Thank you

Not a problem. Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree. As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights). Northwest (talk) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you! Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)

RINO Of The Year, 2023

Hello Mr. Schlafly,

I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year!

Thank you!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Yes, terrific choice for the winner of this ignominious award! Please post!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:59, January 5, 2024 (EST)
TheNewRight, I've checked your contribution history. Since the article's creation on Monday, you have made zero effort to reach out to other editors and make sure they at least knew about the article's existence. That's why there hasn't been much discussion. Until now, nobody except you knew about the article's existence.
Now that I myself know about of the article's existence, I will be making my own contributions to the article sometime this weekend. In the meantime, I strongly suggest you start promoting the article on the main talk page so other editors have an opportunity to contribute as well.--Geopolitician (talk) 01:34, January 6, 2024 (EST)

A question.

Is there a reason Sodomy doesn't simply redirect to Sodom? Cazle (talk) 17:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Fixed.
User: Cazle, thank for the input. In the future, don't be reticent to take the initiative and fix Conservapedia shortcomings yourself. Conservative (talk) 17:28, January 11, 2024 (EST)
I couldn't, I don't have the necessary permissions. Cazle (talk) 17:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)
Thank you. Cazle (talk) 17:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Please give the hacked user account SkipCaptcha ‎permission

Andy, please give the User:BHathorn2 account SkipCaptcha ‎permission.

I appreciate you giving the User:BHathorn this permission, but I actually wanted it for the User:BHathorn2 account. Conservative (talk) 02:35, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I did this correctly as requested, thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:57, January 12, 2024 (EST)
I got my new glasses, but I need to get them fixed. I am awaiting to getting this issue fixed. Bear with me in the meantime! Conservative (talk) 03:02, January 12, 2024 (EST)

Please give this user picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue

Please give NishantXavier picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue.

In addition, I will look at some of the pictures he posts to make sure he is doing things right.

Also, I gave him various sources of public domain pictures and Creative Commons type pictures on his user talk pages so he should be able to find lot of pictures. Conservative (talk) 22:25, January 15, 2024 (EST)

Moving article "Achievement related articles" to Essay space

I created a number of very constructive and useful articles and the articles can be seen at:

Andy, User:Conservative is being deceptive right here: I am the editor who had to move this "article" into Essay space. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:45, January 21, 2024 (EST)
User:Conservative seems to approve of my improvements. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:50, January 21, 2024 (EST)

I did it because there is a war on meritocracy and achievement by liberals and leftists.

Now RobSmith has gone on a temper tantrum and is vandalizing these articles.

I think I need your assistance.

I will call you today about this matter. Conservative (talk) 07:28, January 21, 2024 (EST)

The articles/Essay's are non-collaborative, and the editor refuses to discuss his contributions, despite the fact that the articles/Essays are all about collaboration and teamwork. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:31, January 21, 2024 (EST)
He is in fact building more algorithms aimed at suppressing other editor's contributions. Duplicity and maliciousness seem to be his two personal star personal accomplishments - while refusing offers to discuss and collaborate. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 07:38, January 21, 2024 (EST)
Andy, User:Conservative's maliciously motivated trolling is still occupying an inordinate amount of my time and ability to make mainspace contributions. I renew my request that User:Conservative be topic banned from foreign policy and defense related matters. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 08:10, January 21, 2024 (EST)
I will accept User:Conservative's apology at anytime for, once again, casting aspersions upon my real-life name and reputation.
Andy, note: User:Conservative is not "adding content" or "creating content"; he is creating an internal algorithm of uplinks in his latest series "Essay: Achievement related articles" (click on anyone of these "related changes", and they are nothing but external uplinks - no content) to promote himself (and also suppress other editors' contributions).
In his Russophobic series, he has nothing but neocon and globalist uplinks. He did not promote conservativism or conservative ideals, rather was motivated by a personal feud with other editors (as is most of his series on Category:RationalWiki). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 14:18, January 24, 2024 (EST)
Andy knows that I wrote a pro-isolationist, noninterventionist essay at Conservapedia which is at: [[Essay: Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?|Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?]].
You haven't written such an essay. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself with your nonsensical labeling of me as a neocon. Nobody is buying what you are selling - including Andy.
"There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare." - Sun Tzu. Conservative (talk) 00:43, January 25, 2024 (EST)
All you've written is a bunch of contradictory nonsense - with uplinks to neocon & globalist sources. And by your own admission have no interest in the subject, only an intent to harass people you get into feuds with on the internet, harming CP's reputation as a viable source.
You do not create or add original content; you might occasionally cut n paste a quote from a source, and in the area of foreign affairs you do not have the requisite judgement to discern neocon and globalist sourcing. The idea that you somehow are qualified to write on "collaboration" and "teamwork" is a joke. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)

A person who often engages in logical fallacies such as yourself is in no position to accuse others of writing "contradictory nonsense".

[[User: SamHB]] said regarding your unreasonableness: "Now let me get to the point for real. Why do you continue engaging with this person?? ...You have better things to do than bang your head against the wall. - SamHB (talk) 11:49, July 28, 2023 (EDT)".

[[User: Karajou]] told you: "The "we" in your silly posting is just you. You are the one who needed to be civil, but refused to do so the past two years. You returned to this site expecting to take it from Andy, to run it your way, to have everyone follow your brand of rules, and all I'm seeing from this silly posting of yours...." - [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 08:09, October 1, 2023 (EDT)".

Now please feel free to engage in last wordism. Conservative (talk) 01:54, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Andy, as you can see, User:Conservative cannot address issues, he can only quote, verbatim, and carry, personal grudges for a long time. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:01, January 25, 2024 (EST)
If you spent half of the time improving your content writing skills that you engage in picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, axe-grinding, and envious brooding maybe your content would get more views.
Don't engage in "excusitis" and blame your content's low page views on someone "suppressing your content". Get off the mat and start training! In the next 30 days, I am going to be reading various books on grammar and writing.
"I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'." - Mohammed Ali. Conservative (talk) 02:13, January 25, 2024 (EST)
More personal attacks. You came here to Andy/talk to accuse me of "vandalizing" a mainspace article you started that I moved to Essay space, which you apparently are quite happy with now. Is that teamwork? is that collaboration? Is that "picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, or axe-grinding"? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:29, January 25, 2024 (EST)
Bottomline, and I think Andy will agree with me: malicious editing and motivations, and vendettas ARE NOT conservative values. And that's all I see in your contributions, as per your own words to me more than 10 years ago, beginning with your Atheism article and series, and virtually everything since. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)
As to trolling, User:Conservative has severely disrupted my ability since July 2023 to chronical daily war reports (which I had done for 18 months prior with 30 additions to Conservapedia proven right); without a topic ban on User:Conservative writing on foreign policy and defense related issues, I will be unable to make a commitment to chronical the impending conflicts with Iran and China. (And Conservapedia will be at the mercy of the MSM neocon garbage User:Conservative recycles). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:10, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Something about something or other...

Content disputes/discussions belong on the relevant mainspace talk page(s), not here (See Organizational skills).
More spam
I said that Communist China, which has state atheism, would likely have increasing economic problems and it is headed for decline. And this is currently happening just like I predicted. You on the other hand, as a response to my writings on China, told me to watch to some leftist YouTube video on China which was complete nonsense. I suggest that you do not write about China because you don't know what you are talking about. And your hyper Russophilia clouds many of your views on Russia. Putin picked the wrong party to have a partnership without limits because China is not going to be a magnificant buyer of oil long term - especially since Russia is going to have increasingly higher oil extraction costs in the future. The golden age of Russian oil nears an end. And the West is derisking from China in terms of importing its goods. Conservative (talk) 22:39, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Russian oil: Lower future production and lower future profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies *[https://archive.ph/RzRRI The Golden Age of Russian Oil Nears an End] *[https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/The-Future-of-Russian-Oil-Production-in-the-Short-Medium-and-Long-Term-Insight-57.pdf The Future of Russian Oil Production in the Short, Medium, and Long Term], [https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/the-future-of-russian-oil-production-in-the-short-medium-and-long-term/ Abstract] *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0LzuMUOO0k How Stable Is the Russian Oil Industry?] - Video *[https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Analysts-Predict-42-Decline-In-Russian-Oil-Production-By-2035.html Analysts Predict 42% Decline In Russian Oil Production By 2035] *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Gcl1dO2_0s Russian Oil's Vanishing Act] - video *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQRcvquXJ2Q Crumbling Infrastructure in the Russian Taiga] - video *[https://ogst.ifpenergiesnouvelles.fr/articles/ogst/full_html/2019/01/ogst190118/ogst190118.html A long-term outlook on Russian oil industry facing internal and external challenges] I trust this clarifies matters. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:|]] [[User talk:|(talk)]]

Nobody was talking to you. You spammed the discussion to confuse Andy so he won't read my request. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:06, January 28, 2024 (EST)
I also predicted that due to the guns vs. butter issue in economics that the Russian civilian sector of the economy would suffer and that it would have long term effects as well. Inflation is high in Russia, the ruble is worth less, there is a labor shortage and now there is a utility/heating crisis in several regions of Russia. See: Russia’s winter troubles: Homes struggling to cope with broken heating systems. Brrr! It's cold in Russia without heat in the winter. Conservative (talk) 23:10, January 28, 2024 (EST)
The issue is not guns and butter, Russia or China, etc.
The issue under discussion right now is your trolling and disruption of my ability to make substantive contributions to mainspace over the past 6 months. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:15, January 28, 2024 (EST)
Content disputes/discussions belong on the relevant mainspace talk page, not here. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:26, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Phyllis Schlafly and her legacy the tradwives are gloriously winning! On behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

Why Gen Z Is Ditching The Girlboss For The Tradwife, The Federalist, 2024. See also: Traditional gender roles are making a comeback

The tradwives are winning! Another glorious victory by Phyllis Schlafly! First she defeated the Equal Rights Amendment and now this! As much as I hate to do it, on behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

For details, please see: Essay: Andy Schlafly, Phyllis Schlafly and the Amish. All they do is win against secular leftists (Rap song). Conservative (talk) 10:16, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Upload tag

The new BHathorn2 account needs the Upload tag restored. Thanks. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:04, January 28, 2024 (EST)

I see that you made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

In the recent changes log, I just saw this: "Obesity‎; 21:25 . . (-24)‎ . . ‎Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ (trim, improve further) [rollback 7 edits]."

I got a good laugh out of this edit. You made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

Post USA Today and prominent atheists citing my Atheism and obesity article in the beginning of 2011, Conservapedia is known for covering the obesity issue.

It has become a big issue since then (Pardon the pun). In March of 2023, the World Obesity Federation (WOF) released a report stating that by 2035 over 4 billion people – more than half the world’s population – will be obese (see: https://www.uclahealth.org/news/worldwide-obesity-rise).Conservative (talk) 17:31, January 29, 2024 (EST)

Ha ha ha. I appreciate the humor! I'll add that amazing prediction that more than half the world will be obese in a decade.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:57, January 29, 2024 (EST)
I just added the material to the obesity article. Conservative (talk) 23:06, January 29, 2024 (EST)
Thank you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:19, January 30, 2024 (EST)

Please ask a Personal remark removed admin to stop harassing me on my talk page because he craves my attention. I stopped reading his messages so its pointless.

User complaints and personal attacks/innuendo do not belong on this page (See Organizational skills, Teamwork skills, Leadership).
Moved to Conservapedia:User_complaints#Please ask a Personal remark removed admin to stop harassing me on my talk page because he craves my attention. I stopped reading his messages so its pointless.

Editor would like his picture uploading rights to be restored

User:BHathorn2 would like his picture uploading rights to be restored. He was able to upload pictures with his previous account. Conservative (talk) 00:39, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Done as requested. Thanks for asking.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:24, February 17, 2024 (EST)
OK. I will tell him. Conservative (talk) 20:45, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Who won this debate about future Russian oil production?

Please look at this essay: Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies.

If you could be so kind, please give your opinion on who won this debate between User: RobSmith and User: Conservative:

Thanks for all your contributions. Conservative (talk) 15:42, February 27, 2024 (EST)

There was no debate. The conversation degenerated rapidly into a series of personal attacks and User:Conservative's gossip. Furthermore, User:Conservative immediately began spamming personal attacks to multiple editors' pages trying to involve them in his personal disputes, sowing divisiveness.
IMO, User:Conservative is just bored (having completed his homosexual & atheism series), and just wants to stir up controversy and division. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 15:45, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Although I did respond to some RobSmith nonsense/deflection, most of the debate was on the issue itself.
And RobSmith lacked any adequate response to my points when pressed in the debate. His denialism and handwaving was so inadequate that he tried to delete a portion of the debate.
Russia is likely going to be in very bad shape in about 10 years due to its lower oil production. The sooner RobSmith comes to grip with this matter, the lesser he will be greatly disappointed later on.
In short, his hyper Russiaphilia/Putinism is built on sand. Conservative (talk) 17:03, February 27, 2024 (EST)
P.S. I sent a copy of this message via email to you and other Conservapedians. Conservative (talk) 17:04, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Take your meds. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:54, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Here's your sources (we've been over this 10k times):
  • Stratfor - a CIA front;
  • Oilprice.com - an investment advisory newsletter and trade publication;
  • Moscow Times - another CIA front.
None of them can be regarded as unbiased, factual reporting. User:Conservative is incapable of discussing sourcing without resorting to personal attacks and harassing other editors to get involved in his problems. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:59, February 27, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, the self-described "aesthete in the art of rhetoric and discourse" (See: Conservapedia influential editors and users ), continues to desperately hide terrible debate performance concerning his debate about the essay Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies which indicates that Russian oil production will likely fall by about 40% within the next 11 years due to extraction cost, labor shortages, etc. and I use the source OilPrice.com, a Russian news outlet, etc. to support this contention. This would be a huge development since Russia still does not have a well-diversified economy and is very dependent on oil/gas sales.

You can see his lame attempt to hide this matter at Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies"

Previously, RobSmith wrote about his work at: Essay:the nobsian method

"You are and I'll put it in the Acknowledgements. If everything goes right, hopefully it'll stand next to the Dialogues of Plato, Socratic method, and Machiavelli Discourses in classrooms someday. nobs 00:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)"

But this is simply not true. A person who is obviously wrong about something admits it and doesn't engage in obfuscation, denialism and go to extreme measures to hide this.

That's the problem with RobSmith, he is trying to foist a false narrative about himself, Russia and Putin at Conservapedia. Conservative (talk) 22:18, February 27, 2024 (EST)

A discussion page is not a "debate" page. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:49, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Reflects the impact of User:Conservative's persistent trolling over the past year and my efforts to counter it.

User:Conservative has successfully taken me away from my sources reporting on Russiagate, the Russia hoax, and several other projects culminating in the Ukraine war. I was unable to write on the momentous events recently on the fall of Avdiivka, and its implications, because of his relentless trolling, occupying whole days at times. His re-cycled Hillary Clinton/Deep State Russia Russia Russia crap should be banned from Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:32, February 27, 2024 (EST)

What's important is for the wiki links from MPR go to updated, important information. However, User:Conservative occupies entirely too much of my time to make substantive contributions, being forced to discuss his bad sourcing which only meet his confirmation bias. When he cannot make an adequate defense of his sourcing, he resorts to personal attacks, and tries to organize lynch mobs among Conservapedia editors, sowing division. He has used this method for well over a decade. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:45, February 27, 2024 (EST)

RobSmith, when you dig yourself a big hole, it is a best practice to stop digging.
Also, I never asked you to post lame attempts to rebut my essays on the talk pages of my essays. You decided to do this. But I did suggest writing counter essays which is something you largely did not do.
Due to your poor analytical/forecasting abilities you have been wrong about China, Putin, Russia and Russia's likely future prospects. But I did offer you some suggestions and resources on how to get better at this.
RobSmith, you wrote: ""Fascism is both socialism and capitalism; and User:Conservative is glad to have Karajou back to defend User:Conservative's brand of "capitalism". RobSGive Peace a Chance! 22:06, October 2, 2023 (EDT)"
RobSmith, it's time you embrace our brand of capitalism. If you can't beat them, join them. Because China and Russia are probably heading for a world of hurt due to their bad public policies and corruption. Conservative (talk) 22:54, February 27, 2024 (EST)
The United States is a mixed economy. Pure capitalism leads to pure chaos, as we would basically have a collection of mini corporate nation-states. Socialism is evil, period. If you are talking about a pro-state, state-mandated, state-regulated, state-endorsed, anti-individual, anti-freedom form of capitalism, then you could "technically" say that particular form of pseudo "capitalism" is fascism. Cazle (talk) 01:36, February 28, 2024 (EST)
That's interesting, but that's not the subject under discussion here. Trust me, you don't want to get involved in this mess. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:54, February 28, 2024 (EST)
Note: I wrote 9,000+ bytes of CP's 13,000+ Capitalism article, more than 15 years ago drawn extensively from Adam Smith. All that's been added to the article since is a lengthy list of Quotes and two small sections on Cold War propaganda. If User:Conservative has a disagreement with my presentation or views on Capitalism, he should make changes or additions in the mainspace, or begin a discussion on the article talk page. But I am getting very tired of User:Conservative (an oxymoronic user name) incessant trolling and personal attacks across CP article pages, on CP editor user pages, and in off-wiki private email lists. I will do what I can, with the powers granted to me as an Admin, to reign his incivility, trolling, abuses, and the horrible example he makes to editors of proper conduct as both an Administrator and Editor. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 04:53, March 4, 2024 (EST)
If you don't know what a talk page is for, what can I say?
If you don't know what fascism is, go back to school. Or read Hayek. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:59, February 27, 2024 (EST)
And the field of international relations is not a field where bigots like Antony Blinken and User:Conservative are allowed to run rampant. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:02, February 27, 2024 (EST)
Andy, Please. He's been trolling us and several editors in their private email all day and evening. Please intervene and tell him to desist. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:16, February 28, 2024 (EST)

Throwing down the gauntlet: A challenge to the man who denies that Russia will have an extremely hard time staffing its oil and gas fields in coming years

Trolling (see email discussion)
Silver-gauntlet-no-splash-md.png

The Oreanda-News agency was founded in August 1994 in Moscow, becoming one of the first independent news agencies in contemporary Russia. Since 2007, it has been based in Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Please read: In Russia, the shortage of personnel in the oil and gas industry was assessed, Oreana News, 2023

RobSmith, you wrote about oil/gas industry skills and Russia currently being short 25,000 people: "Between now and 2035, there is 88% of the population of planet Earth who can step up, learn the job skills, and occupy those positions."

A lot of the remaining Russian oil/gas expertise in Russia is old and about to retire and young Russians are not stepping up to replace those people enough as Oreana News and others have stated. Also, a lot of the expertise that Russia used to deal with was from the Western oil companies and now Russia has bad relations with the West. Furthermore, in terms of legal immigration, people are not flocking to Russia. In fact, Russia has a brain drain now.

So people who are knowledgeable about future Russian oil/gas production, such as the people at OilPrice.com, are not optimistic.

Your denialism as exhibited by your magic wand waving on the likelihood that Russia will solve this problem is unrealistic and fantasy. You are wishcasting to the nth degree. If the problem was so easy for Russia to fix, Russia would have solved it by now and not be short of 25,000 oil/gas workers. But the problem is getting worse and not better.

So down the pike, like in about 10 years or so (or sooner), it looks like you are going to have to replace Russians/Putin with some other person/group as far as your grossly idealized/unrealistic portrayal of them. Because it looks like Russia is going to be in bad shape in about 10 years or so. But I would suggest worshipping God instead of mere men.

RobSmith, I am giving you a challenge: Give me one credible source that says that Russia is likely going to help solve its expected significantly lower future oil production by 2035 by finding sufficient labor to solve this issue. Just one credible source. I don't expect you being able to do this because I don't expect many people sharing your fantasy. But even if Russia did not manage to achieve this feat, Russian oil is still going to be significantly harder to extract and less profitable to extract. Conservative (talk) 03:00, February 28, 2024 (EST)

Breaking: Media and User:Conservative Revives Russia Hysteria for 2024 Election.
Since 2005, Greenwald has lived in Rio de Janeiro with his (same sex) husband, David Miranda, who is now a (Brazilian) Federal Congressman representing Rio state. In 2017, Greenwald and Miranda adopted two sibling children from Maceió.
from Glenn Greenwald#Personal. I take that you support GloboHomo and child abuse/predation??? Cazle (talk) 01:21, March 3, 2024 (EST)
No, I don't. What specific criticism of his reporting as a journalist do you have? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 05:15, March 4, 2024 (EST)
CP:Trolling: "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions".
Andy, please put a stop to this. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 03:08, February 28, 2024 (EST)

March 1, 2024

Andy, look at this. Look at User:Conservative's edits for March 1, 2024.

After trolling multiple editors in their private email with personal attacks on another editor, he spends hours and hours yesterday removing the evidence of a pointless dispute he started months ago at the heart of his trolling.

No one said he can't hold anti-Russia or anti-China views; the question is, Why now? Why is he engaged in such pro-globalist warmongering in this election year? His timing is atrocious. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 11:24, March 1, 2024 (EST)

I saw your post about Japan's demographic crisis

I saw your post about Japan and its demographic crisis.

I think it's time for the Amish or quiverful Christians to move to Japan. It would be a win-win situation! Conservative (talk) 00:59, March 3, 2024 (EST)

Great idea! There are Amish communities in Canada and South America!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 03:49, March 3, 2024 (EST)

In-site copying duplication on a website is not good

Andy, look at this: [2][3]

The United States has a huge national debt (See: National debt of the United States) and it saw a major spike in the amount of its national pandemic during the pandemic and during the post pandemic

Does this make any sense to you?

He'll copy paste the same nonsense into at least 2 dozen more pages, only to poison the well for the search term "triumphalism", as he has been doing with virtually all new search terms I introduce into CP since last July 2023. I'm close to giving up adding new content. He has totally derailed my efforts to report on two major ongoing wars. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 04:56, March 9, 2024 (EST)

Spam trolling

The phrase, "a major spike in the amount of its national pandemic [sic] during the pandemic and during the post pandemic, should read "national debt", not "national pandemic", I think. (Who knows? It's impossible to get a straight answer). The flaw still exists in its cut n pasted form in at least 3 Essays two weeks later. [4] RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:02, March 25, 2024 (EDT)

An admin is deleting a bunch of my essays because he cannot effectively respond to them using evidence and logic. Have him create counter essays like a conservative would do

The Admin User: RobSmith is deleting a bunch of my essays because he cannot effectively respond to them using evidence and logic.

Andy, you told RobSmith concerning my essays: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)" Conservative (talk) 00:59, March 10, 2024 (EST)

An Admin is engaged in relentless trolling.
His Essays are copy pastes of previous entries, devoid of content. As Andy just said,
  • let's reduce the in-site copying as duplication on a website is not good. Thanks!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:13, March 8, 2024 (EST)
The essays are replete with snide comments in the title directed at me or the subject I'm working on. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:09, March 10, 2024 (EST)
I renew my request for a topic ban on User;Conservative's alleged "geopolitical" and "international relations" nonsensical trolling.
Trolling is defined as impeding another editors' productive efforts; I have not been able to work on the Ukraine series since before the fall of Avdiivka because of this daily nonsense that occupies hours and hours of my time. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:18, March 10, 2024 (EST)
RobSmith, just be honest and say that you are upset about my 15 point essay at: Essay: Russia is not a conservative country.
If you take issue with this essay, please write a counter essay at Essay: Russia is a conservative country. Godspeed. Conservative (talk) 01:20, March 10, 2024 (EST)
I haven't even read it. I know it's a response the Liberal triumphalism, which is a bunch of crap you wrote I'm trying to rewrite and make sense of.
Andy, this right here -> " Have him create counter essays " is a point blank admission of trolling, i.e., intending to occupy and control my time with BS and impede productive editing on daily reports from the Ukraine war. 01:24, March 10, 2024 (EST)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RobSmith (talk)
I'm not interested in writing what he calls "counter essays". All I want to do is keep the NATO war in Ukraine series current. But with censorship by Big Tech and the intel community, language barriers, time zone differences and lag times, it requires my full intention. I am not using my productive energies to debate politics in war time.
User:Conservative takes various concepts I introduce, such as geopolitics, international affairs, international relations, multipolarity, and now triumphalism - words and concepts he never heard before, has ZERO understanding of - googles the term, creates an Essay full of CFR BS from authors he has no idea who they are, to explain what the neocon/globalist meaning of the term is - while calling it "American". It's sickening, especially since hundreds of people are dying everyday as he fans the flames with war rhetoric.
In User:Conservative's warped, twisted mind, he confuses respect with affection. Because I respect Russian culture and the Russian military, in his warped twisted mind he thinks that's affection (like being seduced by a 300lb. fat Slavic woman). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 05:58, March 10, 2024 (EDT)
Read his crap, like his latest 12 points on why Russians deserve to die. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 06:07, March 10, 2024 (EDT)
Look at my Obamagate series - that took 5 years to write in daily installments. It is a definitive contemporaneous historical document, devoid of MSM fake news. User:Conservative has massively disrupted my war diary for the past 7 months - on a subject he is not even interested in. He has targeted me personally with his vindictive attitude for simply exposing the fact that he had absolutely no interest in geopolitics and world affairs when the war broke. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 06:29, March 10, 2024 (EDT)
I predicted communist China's current state of economic troubles, while you took the leftist position that things were ok in China and asked me to watch a leftist video.
Also, it's obvious to me and others that you are a self-described "aesthete in the art of rhetoric and discourse" who can't put together counter essays using facts, evidence and logic.
You wrote: ""It won't happen until China and Russia break the back of US domination, first. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 21:53, August 14, 2023 (EDT)" So it's not surprising to me that you embrace the Chinese propaganda that we live in a multipolar world when we do not. See: The myth of multipolarity. What do the terms unipolar, bipolar and multipolar mean as far as international relations? and Essay: The so-called multipolar world is often mere Chinese propaganda and public relations.
Some people are susceptible to propaganda because they naively think it confirms their false wishes. Others take a more investigative approach and gather various pieces of facts and evidence so they can make sound arguments. Conservative (talk) 09:09, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

I wish you were less obsessed with me and didn't post messages on the talk pages of my essays that I now rarely read. But that is your problem and not mine. Your user page is obsessed with me. Thank God my user page is not obsessed with someone as uninteresting as you. Conservative (talk) 09:30, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

Well, well, well, the rivalry between spiritual gonorrhea and syphilis over here still perpetually rages, eh? —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 09:48, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

The sheer hypocrisy of the original complainer in this section

Just a few years ago, RobalaamSmith had zero problem with straight-up verbatim copy/pasting content I wrote and plastering them in other articles with zero re-wording.

“ Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel! ”

—Matthew 23:24

“ The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. ”

—Ecclesiastes 1:9

—LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 09:46, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

Please join this new debate page

Debate: Is Codex Vaticanus superior in reliability to the Textus Receptus —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 10:08, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

An admin is trying to hide his gross incompetence when it comes to international relations

RobSmith is trying to hide his incompetence when it comes to international relations.

Below is a copy of this matter which can be found HERE.

If China allows private ownership of real estate, they are not really communist, are they? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 12:22, February 19, 2024 (EST)

Note: User:Conservative forged my electronic signature above in one of his hasty trolling rants. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:53, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

Spam. We've heard it a thousand times.
In communist China, which has state atheism, the government owns the urban land under urban buildings.[5] And in China, they have one-party rule and its the Chinese Communist Party. And this rule is not very good. See: Essay: The rising rule of communist idiocracy in China
RobSmith you wrote: "IOWs, if you don't have anything positive to say about socialists and communists, just shut up, at least for the duration of the war. Read the bios of Bill Donovan, Frank Knox, and Henry Stimson. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, you especially need to just shut up. RobSGive Peace a chance 17:54, January 21, 2023 (EST)"
RobSmith, since Russia has been so dependent on selling oil to China recently, why do you know so little about China? Aren't you Conservapedia's resident international relations expert? Your reply partly explains why you are so adamant about stifling debate and why you endeavor to censor information. Conservative (talk) 05:38, March 13, 2024 (EDT)
Rob, if "they are not really communist", why do they call themselves the Chinese Communist Party? NishantXavierFor Christ the King 06:44, March 13, 2024 (EDT)
In the midst of the communist Xi Jinping's personality cult that honors Mao Zedong, RobSmith incompetently says that China is "not really communist" (See: China’s Xi Jinping to pay homage at Mao mausoleum amid fears of new personality cult, December 2023, Radio Free Asia and China resolution enshrining Xi scraps ban on 'personality cults', Nikkei Asia, 2021 and Creating the Cult of Xi Jinping: The Chinese Dream as a Leader Symbol, Cornell International Affairs Review).
This is incompetence of biblical proportions. And he wonders why people challenge his self-proclaimed international relations expertise. Conservative (talk) 13:33, March 13, 2024 (EDT)

When people make big mistakes, they should acknowledge it and not try to hide it. 14:08, March 13, 2024 (EDT)

  • (A) I wrote the Chinese Communist Party, Xi Jinping and Mao Zedong articles cited here;
  • (B) I have never EVER EVER EVER discussed the Chinese economy with User:Conservative anywhere, onsite, in private email or phone conversation, and do not intend to.
  • (C) This is trolling of Biblical proportions. Please rein in your attack dog or put a choke collar on him or sumpthin. Thnx. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:53, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
The CCP is a corporation. In fact, a multinational for-profit corporation.
We are moving past the "ideological era". RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 16:27, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Joe Biden and Hunter Biden are joint partners with the Bank of China, a government-controlled entity, that uses Chinese Social Security Trust Funds to purchase/invest American defense contractors. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 16:34, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
<Background>In the 1930s & 40s, the Communist International organized labor unions throughout the world (collective bargaining became legal in the US in 1936). Throughout the 1940s &50s the fear was, in the event of war with Moscow, Moscow could just call a labor strike in defense plants throughout the West. Nowadays we've gone a step up - American leaders and the "elite" are joint stockholders with the entity pledged to pay retirement benefits to Chinese workers. And it's done through the Chinese Communist Party's legal ownership of shares in subcontractors of the US military industrial complex.
This is what the testimony of Bobulinski was about last week, five years in the making. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:07, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Chinese Premier Li Qiang to Janet Yellen yesterday: "It is hoped that the United States will abide by the basic norms of market economy including fair competition and open cooperation, refrain from turning economic and trade issues into political or security issues, and view the issue of production capacity objectively and dialectically from a market-oriented and global perspective".
RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:44, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Andy
I need quick action on my request for a topic ban. User:Conservative once again is violating CP Commandments and Guidelines by spamming personal attacks across user pages. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 14:25, March 13, 2024 (EDT)

The Emmanuel Macron article and articles about other prominent political figures

Please take a look at the talk page history of the Emmanuel Macron article at Talk:Emmanuel Macron.

I made a good argument that the allegation that Macron's wife is a transexual was a spurious allegation that has no business being in the second section of the article plus an excellent case that the lede section is poor the article which is preventing it from reaching the 100,000 page view threshold at this time. So many of our articles about prominent political figures now have poor lede paragraphs and sections which is artificially suppressing the traffic to the website. Conservative (talk) 19:30, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Andy,
De-sysop him. His relentless, malicious, trolling and inability to do basic research and work with others without crying to you like a baby is out of control.
This is the same guy who spends months and months writing about gay atheists and their French Fry eating, naming them by name, or makes a big deal on the Obama page about Michelle Obama eating a 2,400 calorie burger (which isn't even in her current bio). Now he complains about worldwide MSM reporting stories that may offend a globalist warmonger. Topic ban. Or de-sysop. Now. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:45, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
NYPost thought it was worthy reporting: Mar 9, 2024: French President Emmanuel Macron, 46, fires back for first time at claims wife, 70, was born a man. User:Conservative is trolling both you and me, preventing both of us from productive editing while he writes screeds about how Russia should be criticized because it is LESS tolerant of gay rights than the United States. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:55, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Andy,
He's got you bamboozled into thinking he's an SEO expert. He's not. All he's done is run robots on his pages to promote himself and suppress other's contributions.
He's led you to believe that Homosexuality and bestiality is of more popular interest on a conservative website than Phyllis Schlafly. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:09, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Homosexuality and bestiality still outranks Phyllis Schlafly. Nice work, Cons. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 11:39, March 20, 2024 (EDT)
Andy, I am no fan of Richard Dawkins who is far less prominent figure than Emmanuel Macron that I am also not a fan of. And yet, the far less prominent figure of Richard Dawkins was able to have a 1,500,000 page view article at Conservapedia (As you know, the view counter was accidentally reset which caused the article to lose 500,000 page views on the counter), but the Macron article on a prominent political figure has yet to hit near 100,000 page views.
Your page views are inorganic plus a bunch of leftist trolls you constantly bait to vandalize Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:18, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Why is this so? The article calls Macron a fascist in the lede section despite that this is highly improbable given that his nation was overrun by German fascists in WWII. In addition, the lede has a hyper partisan, speculative tone/material in the lede one of which is a link to a dead forum link. In the second section of the article rather than having evergreen content, has some gossipy allegation that Macron is married to a transexual (Donald Trump, who is married, owned a beauty pageant and is known for his woman chasing past, said Macron's wife had a nice figure on a visit to France. Conservative (talk) 20:13, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
Here's the problem right here: instead of fixing the problem, he comes whining here like a little brat. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:19, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Robsmith, you wrote above: "Your page views are inorganic".

Social media shares for Conservapedia's atheism article: Screen capture taken on November 3, 2017 from the website Sharedcount.com:

Social media shares for Conservapedia's atheism article. The above graphic is a screen capture taken on November 3, 2017 from the website Sharedcount.com

The Conservapedia atheism article has been shared at the Freedom From Atheism Foundation Facebook page.

RobSmith, you can say until you are blue in the face that "Your page views are inorganic", but I have a screen share from Sharedcount.com indicating that Conservapedia's atheism article, which I largely wrote, was shared at least 6K times at Facebook which is only one of several social media websites. In addition, it has been repeatedly been cited by Shockofgod on YouTube plus elsewhere.

Andy believes that Conservapedia's atheism article is its most popular article. And he has the server logs and other data backing this up. Conservative (talk) 02:06, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

317 shares on gay talk forums you trigger to vandalize CP doesn't add up to 7 million. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:09, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
Well, you welcome to assert until your blue in the face that my view counts are not organic, but sharedcount.com doesn't lie. Andy is a Harvard Law School trained lawyer and good lawyers respect proof and evidence.
"You teach yourselves the law, but I train your minds. You come in here with a skull full of mush; you leave thinking like a lawyer." - Charles W. Kingsfield Jr., The Paper Chase (1973).[6] Conservative (talk) 02:22, March 17, 2024 (EDT)
Let's do the math: 7,000,000 / (6k + 371 + 6.3) = 522, meaning each share generated 522 hits outside of Lewis Black giving you a nod. Impressive. Now, I know you keep figures on global atheism. It would be interesting to see how many (whom you singlehandedly defeated and are non-existent now) visited CP, or maybe how many times each one did to rack up 7 million (being they are so few in number).
Oh, and the plug you got from Lewis Black must've been like a Billy Graham Crusade, with thousands coming forward to give their lives to Christ. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 02:46, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

An Admin is creating pro-LGBT content in Conservapedia

[7] The video he posted criticizing Russian attitudes toward openly gay people from The Independent was created by a Soros-funded Open Society Foundation group. The Admin uses it to attack Russia attitudes toward homosexuality. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 05:40, March 18, 2024 (EDT)

Why is it pro-LGBT to acknowledge that some men in Russia are against homosexuality? There is data indicating that 60% of Russians are against homosexuality or are uncomfortable with it. Acknowledging reality is a good thing.
An encyclopedia should be reality-based and be objective as possible. Conservative (talk) 10:18, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
Conservapedia doesn't get George Soros' money; why do we promote the Soros agenda? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 11:05, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
Stating reality isn't George Soros agenda. And I recall you sharing this same video with me of some Russian guys yelling epithets are two men walking down the street holding hands except it was in the long form of the same video. So needless to say, you are acting hypocritically.
Although I have my doubts that the original video was funded by Soros, you are using a genetic fallacy which is a logical fallacy. Reality, truth and logic inevitably triumphs over partisanship, all-or-nothing thinking and cartoonish versions of white hat vs. black hat thinking. Conservative (talk) 13:38, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
Oh, you admit you trolled me on your latest pro-globalist, pro- neocon hate screed? Hmmm....
As to China: We don't need any neocon anti-China warmongering right now, either. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 14:14, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
Congratulations. Because of the countless hours wasted dealing with User:Conservative's trolling on international events, I have zero time to deal with items like this which most certainly will impact the 2024 election and Donald Trump's efforts:
Trump unable to secure $454 million appeal bond in New York civil fraud case, his attorneys say.
Good luck. I hope User:Conservative is proud of his accomplishment. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 15:16, March 18, 2024 (EDT)

Sinophobia

Example of User:Conservative's Sinophobia in a mainspace article.

User:Conservative's Sinophobia has driven off at least two editors, User:LT and User:ChenXiansheng. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:20, March 18, 2024 (EDT)

This is a nutso complaint. And I just received a nice private note from LT either today or yesterday. It's too bad you drove LT and others out and have caused other editors to edit less (One editor told me he edits less due to your behavior). You are engaging in projection. Accusing me of doing things you have done or are doing. This is not healthy behavior.
On the other hand, I recently helped bring in a new editor who is a friend of a friend. I don't see you bringing in new editors - despite driving editors away or causing editors to edit less. Conservative (talk) 19:03, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
Well congratulations. With all the election news now, there's no one to report on it due to your trolling. It's unlikely readers will turn to Conservapedia for election news between now and the August conventions, or November elections if the foundation for reliable information isn't laid now.
User:LT & User:ChenXiansheng both complained to me often enough about your Sinophobia. Your paltry excuses mean nothing. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:27, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
And quit your gossiping ("One editor told me"). I named names that can be verified. Your idea of Teamwork skills, Leadership, and Collaboration skills is to organize lynch mobs with sockpuppets and Rattrolls ("friend of a friend"). RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:35, March 18, 2024 (EDT)
I had a romantic relationship with a Chinese woman who became a U.S. citizen. Her and her sisters authentic Chinese cooking was much better than Chinese takeout and restaurant food which is Americanized/Westernized. And I drove about 6 hours to see her baptism. And I did a lot of volunteering for International Students Incorporated which has a sizable Chinese Student population in terms of the people who are recipients of their ministry.
I probably have a bigger Mandarin vocabulary than you do. With that being said, I have one word to say to you: 晚安. Conservative (talk) 20:24, March 18, 2024 (EDT)

I received the below message from LT on Monday:

RobSmith is almost certainly 100% lying... I don't recall ever complaining to him about you being "Sinophobic."
His assertion that I quit because of you allegedly being "Sinophobic" is a total pants-on-fire lie.
I quit because of him, not because of you.
I quit primarily because RobSmith was an insufferable son of Belial.
You can copy/paste this right above ^^^ and quote it verbatim to refute RobSmith."

I trust this clarifies things. Conservative (talk) 11:10, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

The list of editors who quit or never signed up because of User:Conservative is gotta be in 10,000s, if not 100,000s. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 11:15, March 20, 2024 (EDT)}}
LT calling RobSmith a liar concerning RobSmith's charge that he quit Conservapedia due to my supposed Sinophobia.

I trust this further clarifies matters. Conservative (talk) 19:06, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

Oh, LT can't speak for himself. Yes, LT complained on multiple occasions, as well as User:ChenXiansheng about User:Conservative's racism. The record is in the Slack group.
In fact, LT became highly critical of me because of what he perceived as my "refusal" to do anything about it, or confront User:Conservative on his racist content added to Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 19:45, March 20, 2024 (EDT)}}

More gossip and collusion with Ratvandals. Conservapedia is not a mobocracy

Mobocracy.PNG

Obsession with sex

User Conservative should be remonstrated for his obsession with sex. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:11, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

He has a trolling obsession with sex. [8][9]

When User:LT & RobSmith approached User:Conservative privately to inform him that the US Justice Dept. cited User:Conservative's work in a federal indictment for a hate crime that received much publicity, User:Conservative laughed off concerns other editors had about their own reputations, and Conservapedia as a whole, and made no cooperative effort to review his own content posting. The Oregonain/Oregonelive reported:

"Investigators obtained a warrant and searched the son’s cellphone and bedroom computer. McGee had previously downloaded videos of gay people being harmed and assaulted, had done an extensive internet search into homosexuality and gay life, as well as how to get away with murder and dispose of bodies, the FBI agent wrote in the complaint.

From October 2020 through July 5, McGee accessed pages on “gay bashing” and “Homosexual Agenda” on Conservapedia, an English-language, wiki-based online site, the complaint said. He also ordered a tire thumper and a wig from Amazon in June, according to the complaint.

“This was an attempted murder,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Gavin Bruce said at Tuesday’s detention hearing...."

The accused later was convicted of a federal crime. [10]

If reading Conservapedia can be used to secure a federal search warrant, indictment, and conviction, it should be a concern of all of us. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 20:17, March 23, 2024 (EDT)

He won't leave a dead issue alone. [11][12][13][14] RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:52, March 27, 2024 (EDT)

Here's another one

I just don't have the time to update or add the content to articles due to User:Conservative's trolling. I'm sorry. Andy, please do something. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 10:37, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

It's gotten ridiculous. User:Conservative has the time to write about fat atheists eating French Fries, or how Russia should be criticized cause it's not as liberal on gay rights as America, but I can't write on the vital issues of the day due to his unceasing trolling. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 10:41, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

Topic ban, revisited

Andy, I have good source material dealing with Trump's bond requirement. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to work with it. There's about a 7 month gap already in my Ukraine war chronology due to the trolling I've suffered from User:Conservative.

I'm not going to spend months building a reader base, only to have User:Conservative destroy it once again. His promises and pledges to cease trolling are meaningless. I can't take on several subjects - war, elections, economy and whatever else, giving incomplete coverage. I need an enforceable topic ban for the remainder of this year if he strays into the area of foreign policy or geopolitics again.

This remedy is limited in time and scope and appropriate for the harm suffered. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 06:09, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

Conservapedia:Topic bans: "Editors who persistently create poorly thought out edits on a particular topic(s) or who purposefully do poor edits in a particular topic(s) may be asked to stop editing a certain topic(s)..."

There is more than enough evidence to prove User:Conservative has persistently, and purposely, created "poorly thought out edits" in the field of international relations, foreign policy, and geopolitics.

So much so, it has impacted CP's ability to credibly and responsibly report on the Trump candidacy and 2024 elections. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 21:07, March 21, 2024 (EDT)

Andy, I'm pretty much done contributing anything on domestic matters if you are going to allow User:Conservative to continue trolling with nonsense like this and not impose a topic ban on his foreign policy trolling.

This not only includes election coverage now, but will also include any aftermath for however long it takes should the election end in controversy, which it likely will. IOWs, I'm out on domestic policy for pretty much the next year thanks to User:Conservative. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 13:09, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

The policy here has always been to give editors substantial leeway in what they post. The suggestion of a topic ban is interesting but we've never tried to limit editors like that, so it would be a substantial change in a nearly 20-year-old successful policy of letting a thousands flowers bloom, so to speak. Over time, the wheat inevitably separates from the chaff.
Thanks for understanding.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:51, March 28, 2024 (EDT)
My point is, when one editor's trolling effects another editor's ability to edit, we do have standing policies in place, short of banning or revocation of rights, to deal with it. And an editing sanction can be imposed for a limited or probationary period. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:05, March 28, 2024 (EDT)
Are you sure you want to go down this path? There is plenty for me to write about America's failing economy, but I can't and won't so long as you continue to allow User:Conservative to scapegoat Russia and China with MSM & neocon talking points as war approaches. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:15, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
Some of the essays about Russia are non-encyclopedic and I've requested a return to substantive, encyclopedic editing. I'm hopeful.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:07, March 30, 2024 (EDT)
I missed being able to exploit the while Trump-attends-cop-wake-while-Democrat-fundraiser-descends-into-chaos fiasco. Election outcomes and the economy mean nothing if this warmongering and Russophobia continues to permeate readers conscious- especially from alleged 'conservative' sources. A year has already been wasted. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 13:46, March 31, 2024 (EDT)
Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"
You can keep nagging Andy about this matter incessantly if you want. But people do have a tendency to eventually totally ignore whining. And I think this is now the case with your voluminous, unsuccessful requests to get me topic banned. Conservative (talk) 22:29, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

Prosopometamorphopsia, demonic faces, and the supernatural

My pastor had a few instances where he was involved with exorcisms.

Christian exorcists in various branches of Christianity report that in a minority of cases there is supernatural phenomena occurring like: levitating bodies/beds; objects being moved around room; "writing" appearing on people's bodies, demonic voices, bodies being distorted, etc. The movie "The Exorcist" was partly based on a real exorcism - specifically the exorcism of Ronald Edwin Hunkeler. See: Trained Exorcist Reveals The Wildest Thing He's Ever Seen While Doing An Exorcism

My pastor mentioned a case where drawers in a dresser and clothing in a dresser was being supernaturally moved and children were hearing a voice and talking to a demon in a closet.

But in addition, he said that people's faces were being distorted in cases involved in his exorcisms, but after they were exorcised, the facial distortion disappeared. Conservative (talk) 03:39, March 23, 2024 (EDT)

I removed the neocon warmongering content from MPR

Please impose a Topic ban. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 12:35, March 23, 2024 (EDT)

Perhaps it's a bit Robespierian: User:Conservative wrote the text of the Topic ban entry that reads: [15]
"Editors who persistently create poorly thought out edits on a particular topic(s) or who purposefully do poor edits in a particular topic(s) may be asked to stop editing a certain topic"
A limited Topic ban in this time of international crisis between now and election day is warranted to cease needlessly stirring up animosity and passions between American voters, the Chinese people, and Russia. Nikki Haley and Mike Pence lost for doing precisely that, and we don't need Biden administration talking points, either. Donald Trump is not pro-war with either Russia or China, but User:Conservative repeatedly is giving credence to the neocon warmongers cause he thinks the US can defeat both on the battlefield. He sounds like Joe Biden. [16][17] RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 16:32, March 23, 2024 (EDT)

Please explain why the below posts that I made to main page right is neocon warmongering

Moved to Template talk:Mainpageright

I sent you and others an email at 2:19pm EST today with some disturbing new information

Today, I sent you and others an email with some disturbing new information.

If you could kindly respond to it, I would appreciate it. Conservative (talk) 16:20, March 24, 2024 (EDT)

A CP Admin has now initiated another troll spree with Rationalwiki

Good luck with it.

I had them contained, until the Admin contacted many of them privately (which he refers to as "belligerence" in "Operation Rogue Admin") and initiated the latest bout of trolling over the last week. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:35, March 26, 2024 (EDT)

Heads up

Without a Conservapedia:Topic ban on User:Conservative's trolling on foreign policy topics, you will be asked to intervene on the attack pages User:Conservative has created to ridicule me and Dr. Steve Turley. Dr. Turley has been cited extensively in Conservapedia articles, Essays, and on MPR as a Christian conservative voice.

User:Conservative has already mentioned asking you to intervene. Dr. Turley is only the first of one such voice you may be asked to intervene with. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:24, April 7, 2024 (EDT)

Question: RobSmith, do you consider yourself to be an "international relations expert". If so, why? If you do consider yourself to be an "international relations expert", who else has said that you are one?
Furthermore, show me one place on the internet where Steve Turley has called himself an international relations expert.
Next, the essay Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy? makes no mention of you. But there are people who do consider themselves to be international experts who engage in the "multipolar fantasy".
This childish tempest in a teapot that you are desperately trying to create is a very sad and pitiful attempt to get my attention. Why are you so desperate to get my attention? I certainly don't crave your attention. I very much largely ignore your copious talk page commentary to my essays at this point. In addition, I don't read your articles or main page posts either. Conservative (talk) 22:40, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
You stated the attack in the plural (reserving discussion on your questionable premise and conclusion). The page was designed as an attack page on living persons. If not myself and Dr. Turley, name some others you had in mind when designing that attack page? RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:43, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
I like Dr. Turley. I created most of the content of the Steve Turley article. I might go on one of his upcoming cruises.
Next, just because I disagree with various international experts, such as Mearsheimer, about whether we live in a bipolar world or a multipolar world, doesn't mean that I am attacking these people. People have civil disagreements with people, including experts, every day. To pretend otherwise is silly.
RobSmith, I certainly hope you don't consider yourself to be an international relations expert or an expert on China/Russia. Because anyone who denies that China is a communist country, such as yourself as you did at Talk:Chinese real estate crisis (2020–present), is most certainly not an expert on China. 23:06, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
At this point, I have no interest in your political opinions about any political matter. That is why I don't read your articles, essays, main page posts or your talk page posts to my essays.
Lastly, you're obssessed with me. I suggest you end this unhealthy obsession with me as soon as possible. Get a grip on yourself. Conservative (talk) 22:53, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
You're spamming. No one interested in your Caribbean Cruises with your Russian and Chinese girlfriends.
Andy, please, topic ban. Foreign policy and international relations is too serious a subject to allow someone with no interest or understanding of to continue using Essay space to attack other editors and sources cited extensively in Conservapedia articles. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:57, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
This problem is easily resolvable: Retitle the Essay to remove the personal attack and innuendo on recognized Conservapedia expert sources and other editors, or delete the Essay. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:02, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
RobSmith, I certainly hope you don't consider yourself to be an international relations expert or an expert on China/Russia. Because anyone who denies that China is a communist country, such as yourself as you did at Talk:Chinese real estate crisis (2020–present), is most certainly not an expert on China. Conservative (talk) 23:07, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
Andy, I will call you and end RobSmith's childish attempts to get my attention such as mainspace article attacks on me such as what he recently tried to do twice in the Steve Turley article. I know that you will end this childish behavior. Conservative (talk) 23:16, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
More spam. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:29, April 7, 2024 (EDT)

Turley, again

This citation to Steve Turley here was made this morning, wherein User:Conservative brands Speaker Mike Johnson as a "RINO". The Turley video is all about Speaker Johnson calling himself a "wartime Speaker" and passing another $61 billion in Ukraine aid (Turley in fact seems quite upset about this latest development). Not 2 days ago User:Conservative posted this pro-war message about his new pro-war Essay to another Admin's talk page.

The Turley video makes no mention of Biden's impeachment and limited reference to FISA reauthorization.

User:Conservative has created a situation where it is impossible to give a sensible, coherent message to conservative readers in this election year. His Essay's contain serious, confusing, and contradictory information about a conservative foreign policy, which can only be temporarily resolved in this election year with a limited topic ban until election day. Thank you. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 17:18, April 18, 2024 (EDT)

If Speaker Johnson is a RINO, User:Conservative is on board with him (and Biden), cause User:Conservative provided all the justification and arguments in his "international relations and geopolitical" Essays. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 17:33, April 18, 2024 (EDT)

The gist of the dispute

Dr. Turley:

"This new civilizational rise is increasingly replacing that unipolar world with what's called a multipolar world... the unipolar world is over. The sooner permanent Washington comes to terms with that, the sooner this tragedy of great power politics will come to an end." - Steve Turley, Media ADMITS Ukraine Is COLLAPSING!!! Media ADMITS Ukraine Is COLLAPSING!!!, Steve Turley, April 4, 2024. YouTube
Big yawn. Turley is not an international relations expert nor has he ever claimed to be. Why are you obsessed with something so trivial as Turley's opinion on this matter? Conservative (talk) 23:44, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
Turley's not an international relations expert? Your citing him as such in Conservapedia is too numerous to count. Most recently: Essay:_How_gay_is_the_West_and_how_lasting_is_homosexuality_in_a_society?#Conservative_religiosity_and_the_prevalence_of_homosexuality._Conservative_religious_and_population_growth_rates. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:56, April 7, 2024 (EDT)

User:Conservative:

"Question: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts declare the nonsense of a multipolar world?"

Leaving aside the condescending tone, User:Conservative now wants to dispute whether or not a PhD in Theology is a "self-declared international relations expert".

Bottomline: User:Conservative uses Essay space to denigrate and ridicule a fellow editor who has relied upon User:Conservative's own "experts" to create article content. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:29, April 7, 2024 (EDT)

RobSmith, I don't have any wish to denigrate you. You are merely someone whose articles, essays, main page posts and talk page posts to my essays that I don't read. And I have zero interest in your political opinions.
You are the one who is clamoring for my attention and not vice versa. Move on. You are embarassing yourself and the more you inconvenience Andy with your nonsense, the less respect he will have for you.
By the way, Andy is now very aware that Russia has a demographic crisis and he doesn't share your hyper Russophilia. Conservative (talk) 23:38, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
You betray you're own lack of interest and understanding of foreign policy and international relations.
There's a difference between "Russophilia" and being pro-Reconcilation between the German people and the Russian people after a horrendous war that claimed 55 million lives. I, for one, don't want to see anything like that ever again. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 23:45, April 7, 2024 (EDT)
If you are looking to wrangle with someone about your political opinions, as I have said, go to X (Twitter) and political forums. I don't have a scintilla of interest concerning your political opinions. I like the world of facts, evidence, truth and very informed opinions based on sound arguments and evidence.
My essay at Essay: The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future, whose page view counter is over 20,000 page views, is brimming with facts and evidence. Conservative (talk) 00:02, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Brimming with bot counts, as you mislead conservative readers about Steve Turley and the issues facing American foreign policy. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 00:05, April 8, 2024 (EDT)

I don't care what Steve Turley says about bipolarity or multipolarity. He's not even an international relations expert. But even if he was, the evidence presently argues for a bipolar world as I point out in my essay. Nor do I care about your opinions on this matter. Move on. Conservative (talk) 00:17, April 8, 2024 (EDT)

Your argument would make sense if you knew what bipolarism, multipolarism, and unipolarism were, but you didn't have a clue until about 6 or 8 months ago when you asked me on the phone to explain it to you. Five or ten minutes on the phone isn't enough, nor is the liberal globalist Peter Zeihan you rely on so much, nor is Multipolarism for Dummies which you probably haven't read, either.
Andy, Topic ban, please. To stop this ceaseless trolling and allow me to get back to article creation and content. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 00:26, April 8, 2024 (EDT)

This is what's so objectional

Dr. Turley: "...the sooner this tragedy of great power politics will come to an end."

User:Conservative: "Big yawn."

This is what I find so objectional, User:Conservative's cavalier attitude toward war and killing. His typical response is, "Well, they have a low fertility rate, so who cares?" RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:04, April 8, 2024 (EDT)

More spam & trolling
I hope you don't hope too much that I take the "cavalier attitude toward war and killing" bait. If you do, you will be very disappointed. Conservative (talk) 01:19, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
oh, cause Russia allegedly has a low labor productivity rate measured in Petrodollars is reason enough to shoot up the Crocus Hall music concert and kill people. Sound logic, coming from you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:29, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
This Turley tempest in a teapot behavior is indicative of your incessant splitting (all of nothing), irrational type "thinking". Just because I agree with some of Steve Turley's views on traditionalism/conservatism/religion/Democrats/Rpeublicans, etc. doesn't mean I have to agree with all his views - especially his views on international relations where he has no expertise.
This is one of the reasons why your political opinions are so tiresome and why I have no interest in them. Conservative (talk) 01:05, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
I'm not giving you my political opinions. I'm complaining to Andy about your user conduct. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:09, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Your callous disregard for human suffering is on display for everyone to read. Andy needs to rein you in with a topic ban. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:17, April 8, 2024 (EDT)


Why don't you just admit that your personal attack was a childish response to me pointing out that Russia has a low ability to innovate compared to many countries and is ranked #51st in the world in Global Innovation Index and that it also has a low labor productivity rate that even Putin admitted to. And the situation is likely going to get worse for Russia on the innovation front (See: Essay: Russia is far behind the USA and China as far as innovation and Russia's ability to innovate is likely going to get worse. You are allergic to facts and get angry at reality. This is no way to live a life. Conservative (talk) 01:23, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Huh? What? What personal attack?
You're spamming again. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 01:25, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
There is no "huh". Your allergy to reality and anger/bitterness is very predictable and so are your vain attempts to censor. Conservative (talk) 01:28, April 8, 2024 (EDT)
Oh, I get it now. Citing a work coming from you is a "personal attack". Okay. Makes sense, coming from you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 10:39, April 9, 2024 (EDT)
Maybe now you understand why we have the Template:Hide, but I doubt it.
You think everyone's a fool, that you spam these discussions on Andy talk so Andy won't have the patience to read it? 01:31, April 8, 2024 (EDT)RobSZelensky didn't kill himself
Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 01:44, April 8, 2024 (EDT)

The jury's verdict is in

Move to User talk:RobSmith‎‎

Operation Afterburner II: Abridged and slightly altered message sent to Conservapedians on 4-9-2024

SR-71 Blackbird afterburn.jpg

Operation Afteburner II: Abridged and slightly altered message to Conservapedians sent on 4-9-2024:

"When I was creating and promoting my atheism/homosexuality articles, I developed some successful strategies/tactics which I dubbed "Operation Afterburner"...

Although I am going to be tackling some projects for a while, I am going to launch an "Operation Afterburner II" related to my atheism articles and articles on the USA/Russia/China/international relations/geopolitics.

For a sneak preview, see: Operation Afterburner II 😁

Sincerely,

User: Conservative"


It's going to be glorious. Three olé glorious. Another sneak preview: Olé! Olé! Olé! 😁 Conservative (talk) 18:22, April 9, 2024 (EDT)

"When I was creating and promoting my atheism/homosexuality articles", i.e. running up the page view counter with bots. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 18:27, April 9, 2024 (EDT)
Says the man who refuses to upgrade his content creation and writing skills and merely has 150,000+ page views to his Vladimir Putin article. Even Conservapedia's PZ Myers article has 200,000+ page views and he is a very minor public figure.
Get off the mat, start training and stop your "excusitis" lame excuses that it's my fault. Adults who are champions take responsibility for their poor performance and train to get better. I laugh at your "User: Conservative the evil SEO genius is suppressing the traffic to my articles" lame excuse. Conservative (talk) 18:36, April 9, 2024 (EDT)
Your Bestiality article still has my Ocasio-Cortez article beat by a few. Better crank up the robot to save it. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 18:50, April 9, 2024 (EDT)
Andy, have you read User:Conservative's latest geopolitical treatise from the Haushofer school: Essay: America's sewage system is better than Russia's TERRIBLE sewage system? When people Google "Conservapedia+geopolitics" they are getting a good healthy dose of Haushofer, ("Russia is not only incapable of creating a civilization, they are in fact a danger to it") Hitler & Rudolf Hess's mentor and the father of modern Geopolitics. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 17:57, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

Andy, AOC, Stephen Colbert Spread Debunked Lies About 'Russian Disinformation,' Biden Probe.

In this election year, User:Conservative is far too amateurish in the field of geopolitics. I waste minimum 3 hours daily removing his citations to deep state and globalist think tanks - even boards Hunter Biden served on like the National Endowment for Democracy. This is counter-productive.

And the problem is he spams it on a dozen pages. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 23:36, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

It is pointless posting news items like Time to Rethink Your Never Trumpism on MPR if User:Conservative is allowed to continue spamming his Haushofer School of Geopolitics all over the wiki. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 17:07, April 11, 2024 (EDT)

So that's what "Operation Afterburner" was, to turn the Russia article into another neocon hit piece. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 14:36, April 15, 2024 (EDT)

A new font for Mark Chapter 1

Hello Andy! Thank you, once again, for the help yesterday.

I have just performed an edit to Mark Chapter 1 to use the ideal font for phonics learning: 28-point Century Schoolbook. I have also decreased the width of the page, so a student do not "lose" his place. Should I perform a similar edit on Mark Chapter 2, Mark Chapter 3, etc.? In Christ, MayGodBless (talk) 12:13, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

Very nice! A similar improvement on the fonts for the other chapters of Mark would be wonderful! Thank you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 13:38, April 10, 2024 (EDT)
Done! I am also considering looking through the image archives on Conservapedia to illustrate the chapters. MayGodBless (talk) 19:21, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

Russia

Andy,

User:Conservative is polluting the main Russia article with a bunch of neocon deep state think tank propaganda and sources. Topic ban.

He's used CEPA in about a half dozen sub articles. See what Wikispooks says about CEPA https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Center_for_European_Policy_Analysis

The problem is, he never researches his sources first. Just spams it everywhere. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 19:12, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

My fellow American. I believe that we will win! USA! USA! USA!

Andy,

A quick update:

Have a great day! Conservative (talk) 03:32, April 11, 2024 (EDT)

The page that a Conservapedian suggested we create so Conservapedia web visitors can sign up to be a new editor.

As you know, a Conservapedian suggested that we create a page so Conservapedia web visitors can sign up and to be a new editor to Conservapedia. And that we feature a link to this page on main page left.

I designed a page using the KISS approach which stands for Keep It Simple Stupid.

Please look at this sample page and then contact me with your feedback. The sample page is at: User:Conservative/Sign up to be a new editor sample page.

After we agree on the page content and what the invitation on main page left looks like, we can have the other Conservapedian give us his feedback because it was his idea and because he is a sharp individual with good judgment. Conservative (talk) 03:06, April 12, 2024 (EDT)

"new editors can sign up to be a new editor". Your new editors can sign up to be a new editor needs editing. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 10:39, April 12, 2024 (EDT)

Earthquakes

Do you not believe in the shifting of tectonic plates along fault lines? What would you suggest causes earthquakes then? Cazle (talk) 03:20, April 14, 2024 (EDT)

The evidence does not support the tectonic-plate theory for earthquakes. The atheistic science promoting the tectonic plate theory is repeatedly contradicted by earthquakes where there is no fault line (e.g., recently in New Jersey), and the lack of large earthquakes where they have long been predicted (e.g., California).
What does cause earthquakes? Could be the increasing instability in the Earth's orbit, as predicted by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, or a cause not yet discovered (notice how a false scientific theory obstructs development of a correct one). A non-materialistic cause is also possible, as with other phenomenon such as butterflies migrating thousands of miles to the same locations each year. Satan as the cause is a possibility, too, and it may be impossible to explain his behaviour materialistically or rationally.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 15:13, April 14, 2024 (EDT)

Change to Conservapedia:Commandments

Hello again Andy! I have a suggestion for improving the Conservapedia:Commandments. The 4th commandment reads:

When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.

I think it should make a general point about avoiding liberal bias, liberal deceit, and liberal claptrap, because that is not currently reflected elsewhere in the commandments. For example,

Avoid liberal style, including as liberal bias, liberal deceit, and liberal claptrap. For example, when referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.

Do you have an opinion on this improvement? In Christ, MayGodBless (talk) 13:09, April 15, 2024 (EDT)

Yah, it turns the Commandments into liberal claptrap if you link to those pages cause anybody can edit those pages. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 13:37, April 15, 2024 (EDT)

Friendship, loneliness, marriage, conservative values and liberalism

Thanks for your material on friendship, loneliness, marriage, conservative values and liberalism over the years. As one gets older, one understands the importance of these things. And along the way of writing various articles, I have made some friendships at Conservapedia.

Today, I added some content related to some of these topics that you may find informative.

Post pandemic, I am in the midst of pouring myself into various endeavors where I will be much more in contact with friends, family, church members, colleagues, clients, etc. It's a shame that people are often creatures of habit and many people will continue to self-impose isolation on themselves - even though the pandemic is over. One of my business associates who refused to change his life one iota due to the pandemic got Covid three times, but he was never lonely, his business was better for it and he helped restaurants during the pandemic. Damn the torpedoes - full speed ahead! Conservative (talk) 10:14, April 16, 2024 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&oldid=2041716"