Difference between revisions of "User talk:ChadUser"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Sysop warning)
(You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags.)
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 55: Line 55:
  
 
==Sysop warning==
 
==Sysop warning==
You apparently [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChadUser&diff=1762720&oldid=1762693 cut n pasted a response] to my good faith efforts to help you save much of your categorization schemes. '''[[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate.2Ftrolling_behavior:_Examples]] defines trolling as:
+
You apparently [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChadUser&diff=1762720&oldid=1762693 cut n pasted a response] to my good faith efforts to help you save much of your categorization schemes. '''[[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate.2Ftrolling_behavior:_Examples|Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate/trolling behavior: Examples]] ''' defines trolling as:
*''''Employing <u>redundant arguments</u> intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions.'''''
+
*'''''Employing <u>redundant arguments</u> intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions.'''''
  
 
In the future, please address specific comments, questions, and requests directly, and do not employ redundant arguments.  Such behavior is [[trolling]]. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 
In the future, please address specific comments, questions, and requests directly, and do not employ redundant arguments.  Such behavior is [[trolling]]. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Re: I need your help ==
 +
 +
I mean I don't know what to say to this really. Looks like you and him got caught in somewhat of an argument, but at least he allowed you to keep the pages, right? If you think about it, people are more likely to read articles than categories -- the general public, that is. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 23:18, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Trolling==
 +
You have been warned on more than one occasion to cease your trolling Categorization schemes. An earlier troll had miscategorized <nowiki>[[:Category:Traitors]] as a subcategory of [[Category:Liberals]], [[Category:Democrats]], and [[Category:Democratic Party]]</nowiki>. [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Traitors&direction=prev&oldid=1763684]  Rather than correct the error, you ''added'' more than 30 Republican sitting Congressional Representatives to a Category that previously had only one element, [[Benedict Arnold]], in the 232 year history of the United States Republic, evidently with the intent to defame living persons and elected representatives of the people.
 +
 +
Have a nice day. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 13:20, June 1, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
== You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags.  ==
 +
 +
You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags. For example, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vernon_Jones&curid=158949&diff=1765933&oldid=1762897 this tag] called the Republican [[Vernon Jones]] a DINO (A Democrat in Name Only). It makes no sense. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:42, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
:You now have a 5 year topic ban of adding anymore category tags. You are forbidden to add any more category tags for 5 years. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:51, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Xi Jinping a leftwing populist? That's interesting, considering nobody elected him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 16:56, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Why do we have a White Supremacy and Black Supremacy categories? I can't help but think somebody here is trying to promote divisiveness. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 17:25, June 7, 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:25, June 7, 2021

yah yah yah, we know, Josef Tiso was a Catholic priest and Nazi. RobSFree Kyle! 13:28, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

Who is "we"? I didn't even know who that was and had to look him up. DMorris (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2021 (EDT)

yah yah yah, we know. Kristi Noem received criticism from, Republicans and the conservative community. Thanks for pointing that out. RobSFree Kyle! 19:12, 4 April 2021 (EDT)

Talk pages

Go Ahead, ignore a legitimate request from an Admin on a talk page once again. See what happens. RobSFree Kyle! 14:55, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

You never responded here. [1] RobSFree Kyle! 23:41, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

Re: When I am done with the new article

Absolutely, we need to keep a list, thank you! Patriotic Gamer (talk) 11:40, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Great job! I already shared your article with someone Patriotic Gamer (talk) 13:33, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
I like it! Patriotic Gamer (talk) 14:14, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
All right, I told him about it. God bless Patriotic Gamer (talk) 14:18, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Categorization schemes

It has come to my attention there is some discussion among Admins of deleting Category:Former_TINOs and Category:RINOs_Successfully_Removed_in_2022. I have argued for your opportunity to explain why these categories are necessary for the Conservapedia project. Please do so here. Thank you. RobSFree Kyle! 17:34, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

It is about a conservative America First Movement. RINOs removed in 2022, mean that we have an opportunity to replace them with people who want Preisdent Trump's agenda. Now for for former TINOs, TINOs are fake MAGA, and former TINOs no longer hide under MAGA clothes. ChadUser (talk) 18:29, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Thank you. I'll pass along your response.

In my personal opinion, too much of this language and rhetoric appears to have a leftist character, for example, "America First Movement", "America First Agenda", "TINOs", etc. I personally cannot say that I'm familiar with much of it via internal conservative sources and communications. OTOH, much of does appear in attack pieces from sometimes dubious sources.

Thank you again for your cooperation. RobSFree Kyle! 18:36, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

@RobSFree Kyle!, The America First Movement is simply put the Trump Agenda. It supports ending forever wars. It is tough on immigration. It is pro-life and the second amendment. RINOs like Paul Ryan helped sabotage that movement. Watch YouTubers like RedEagle Politics or the Yankee Perspective to understand it better. Or if you just want to use twitter follow the Columbia Bugle. ChadUser (talk) 18:40, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Yes, I understand all of that. here's the problem: Democrats and other leftists are obsessed with "organizing", whereas Republicans and conservatives generally recoil at such efforts and suggestions. This looks too much like classification and organizing efforts. In fact, even certain degrees of "intersectionalism" (for example, linking opponents of amnesty with gun rights advocates, etc.). All of it appears highly suspicious to a conservative mind. RobSFree Kyle! 18:46, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
It is not. Literally watch any America First Youtube channel, and they get onto Republicans like Brian Fitzpatrick. Or checkout Columbia Bugle on twitter. ChadUser (talk) 18:50, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
Look at Breitbart, https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2021/03/19/30-gop-reps-vote-farm-amnesty-govt-supplied-workforce/ They call out Republicans who don't bootlick for Democrats. ChadUser (talk) 18:52, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
There is no America First Caucus. Period. What more needs to be said?
This appears to be an effort to paint the MAGA movement as an organizing effort akin to Obama for America, Organizing for America, the Progressive movement, the Progressive Caucus, etc.. The Trump movement or MAGA movement or whatever label you wish to assign, simply operates on a different level and frame of reference, which apparently you do not understand RobSFree Kyle! 18:56, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

There is no Caucus. America First is very much a movement. RINOs just get in the way of it. Do you like Paul Ryan? Do you like Lisa Murkowski? Do you like Mitt Romney? Do you like Brian Fitzpatrick? What difference does it make between a guy like Brian Fitzpatrick who supports Amnesty and Gun Control, vs a Democrat who also supports those measures. What good does a warmonger like Liz Cheney serve for America, when Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters are also warmongers? What good are Republicans that join the likes of Adam Schiff and Ilhan Omar to impeach Trump? We need people who stand for the agenda of President Trump. We need people who fight against illegal immigration. We need people fighting for a pro-life agenda as well as the second amendment. We don't need people who send us to forever wars. We don't need people who want take away our second amendment. We don't need people who support mass immigration. I am sorry if you don't understand that. ChadUser (talk) 19:04, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

There is no America First Caucus because the elected representatives voted it down. Yet you continue with this organizing categorization scheme that reeks of leftist and intersectional characteristics. RobSFree Kyle! 19:17, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
America First is an ideology and a policy. It is nothing about supporting leftism. If I must say it again. America First is very much a movement. RINOs just get in the way of it. Do you like Paul Ryan? Do you like Lisa Murkowski? Do you like Mitt Romney? Do you like Brian Fitzpatrick? What difference does it make between a guy like Brian Fitzpatrick who supports Amnesty and Gun Control, vs a Democrat who also supports those measures. What good does a warmonger like Liz Cheney serve for America, when Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters are also warmongers? What good are Republicans that join the likes of Adam Schiff and Ilhan Omar to impeach Trump? We need people who stand for the agenda of President Trump. We need people who fight against illegal immigration. We need people fighting for a pro-life agenda as well as the second amendment. We don't need people who send us to forever wars. We don't need people who want take away our second amendment. We don't need people who support mass immigration. I am sorry if you don't understand that. ChadUser (talk) 19:19, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
Yes, and the first element of that ideology is free speech, the right of America First ideologues to differ with each other. You are making no effort whatsoever to emphasize that point, rather you paint them as gun-toting right-wingers who hate immigrants. RobSFree Kyle! 19:22, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
No I don't oppose Mass Amnesty is just what is best for America. America First is general umbrella, there can be some differences of opinion, but everybody who values America First support our constitutional rights. They also don't want to put our troops at risk and continue forever wars. They want to reduce immigration to help put the benefit on the American Worker. Don't even think I am letting Democrats off the hook, I literally made an article that encourages voting them out. 2022 America First Candidates against RINOs and Democrats. ChadUser (talk) 19:25, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
We can go on all day like this. Bottomline: several CP Admins are suspicious of this categorization scheme, and I felt it only fair to warn you before you put more hours into it cause it can disappear in a heartbeat. RobSFree Kyle! 19:28, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
You can think what you want but this is actual made to help's Trump's vision and eliminate RINOs. Another user who is a patriot is sharing this information to help Trump's agenda.ChadUser (talk) 19:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
Don't say no one warned you. [2] RobSFree Kyle! 19:38, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Sysop warning

You apparently cut n pasted a response to my good faith efforts to help you save much of your categorization schemes. Conservapedia:Guidelines#Inappropriate/trolling behavior: Examples defines trolling as:

  • Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions.

In the future, please address specific comments, questions, and requests directly, and do not employ redundant arguments. Such behavior is trolling. Thank you. RobSFree Kyle! 20:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Re: I need your help

I mean I don't know what to say to this really. Looks like you and him got caught in somewhat of an argument, but at least he allowed you to keep the pages, right? If you think about it, people are more likely to read articles than categories -- the general public, that is. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 23:18, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Trolling

You have been warned on more than one occasion to cease your trolling Categorization schemes. An earlier troll had miscategorized [[:Category:Traitors]] as a subcategory of [[Category:Liberals]], [[Category:Democrats]], and [[Category:Democratic Party]]. [3] Rather than correct the error, you added more than 30 Republican sitting Congressional Representatives to a Category that previously had only one element, Benedict Arnold, in the 232 year history of the United States Republic, evidently with the intent to defame living persons and elected representatives of the people.

Have a nice day. RobSFree Kyle! 13:20, June 1, 2021 (EDT)

You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags.

You were told to stop adding a lot of thoughtless category tags. For example, this tag called the Republican Vernon Jones a DINO (A Democrat in Name Only). It makes no sense. Conservative (talk) 11:42, June 7, 2021 (EDT)

You now have a 5 year topic ban of adding anymore category tags. You are forbidden to add any more category tags for 5 years. Conservative (talk) 11:51, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
Xi Jinping a leftwing populist? That's interesting, considering nobody elected him. RobSFree Kyle! 16:56, June 7, 2021 (EDT)
Why do we have a White Supremacy and Black Supremacy categories? I can't help but think somebody here is trying to promote divisiveness. RobSFree Kyle! 17:25, June 7, 2021 (EDT)