Difference between revisions of "User talk:ChrisS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(You are being watched)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Nevertheless your aggressive and intemperate edit to the Obama talk page merited reproof. Be careful before coming out with ideological diatribes in future. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:23, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 
Nevertheless your aggressive and intemperate edit to the Obama talk page merited reproof. Be careful before coming out with ideological diatribes in future. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:23, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Calm Down==
 +
Chris, your comments on the Barack Obama talk page won't have any effect. There is no purpose in getting heated over it. [[User:BethanyS|~Beth]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 09:20, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 14:20, November 14, 2008

Hi Everyone!

If you need to tell me anything you can enter it here... I'm not on that much though so i may not get back to you very soon. --Chris 20:28, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

You are being watched

Please don't revert legitimate edits or you'll be blocked for vandalism. --KaraMel 12:39, 13 November 2008 (EST)

Already blocked, but thanks. --Ed Poor Talk 12:45, 13 November 2008 (EST)
I think that KaraMel was referring to ChrisS and his edits. --Suomalainen 12:47, 13 November 2008 (EST)
*blush* So I thanked the wrong person? --Ed Poor Talk 12:49, 13 November 2008 (EST)

Were you trying to block me? --Chris

No, KaraMel - the vandal you reverted. Sorry for the confusion. --Ed Poor Talk 12:56, 13 November 2008 (EST)

Nevertheless your aggressive and intemperate edit to the Obama talk page merited reproof. Be careful before coming out with ideological diatribes in future. Bugler 05:23, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Calm Down

Chris, your comments on the Barack Obama talk page won't have any effect. There is no purpose in getting heated over it. ~BethTalk2ME 09:20, 14 November 2008 (EST)