Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ctown200"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::You have two businesses to run, but you claim you don't have the time to trim an article? Yet you can find the time to make several complaints about the article's size and why others aren't doing it, as well as re-inserting a tag that was removed by Aschlafly? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:00, 8 November 2010 (EST) | ::You have two businesses to run, but you claim you don't have the time to trim an article? Yet you can find the time to make several complaints about the article's size and why others aren't doing it, as well as re-inserting a tag that was removed by Aschlafly? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:00, 8 November 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==My suggestion== | ||
| + | What you could do is to propose a new layout. The main one would be a disambiguation page of sorts, giving a history of the bias, what the results are, and so on; and this could lead to separate article pages devoted to subject, i.e. "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Politics"; "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Science"; "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Humanities"; and so on. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:06, 8 November 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:06, November 8, 2010
Welcome!
Hello, Ctown200, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Ctown200!
RE: this edit Ctown2000, this isn't Wikipedia where people post banners at the top of entries complaining about something or another. If you don't have the time to make something better, then don't post your view of how something should be changed. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly 16:54, 6 November 2010 (EDT)
- I humbly ask you to reconsider. That page is irresponsibly too large; in fact it is more than four times larger than a page should be, according to the warning message on the top of the page. Until someone helps to trim it down, like I started, it will continue to get out of control. It's already very slow to load, and impossible to save: every time I edit the page the server times out.
- I have asked numerous editors for help, and it seems no one is willing to do any work on it. I have two businesses to run, so I just don't have the time. At least on wikipedia they have groups of editors (projects) where you can ask for help and get it. I've asked a number of people here, and posted on the help desk, but nothing happens.
- That banner is important, because otherwise people just add new junk to the page without considering the proper location for information. It is important that this article is cleaned up, as it's one of the starting points that people visit. We don't want them to see a mess, which it currently is. Ctown200 16:35, 8 November 2010 (EST)
- You have two businesses to run, but you claim you don't have the time to trim an article? Yet you can find the time to make several complaints about the article's size and why others aren't doing it, as well as re-inserting a tag that was removed by Aschlafly? Karajou 17:00, 8 November 2010 (EST)
My suggestion
What you could do is to propose a new layout. The main one would be a disambiguation page of sorts, giving a history of the bias, what the results are, and so on; and this could lead to separate article pages devoted to subject, i.e. "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Politics"; "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Science"; "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Humanities"; and so on. Karajou 17:06, 8 November 2010 (EST)
