User talk:DM

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, DM, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, DM!

With respect to Guyana the information is attributed to its source at the bottom of the page in th template box "Copyright Details". Hope you enjoy editing here. TheGuy 19:55, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Acetic Acid

Why the change? CH3COOH tells us what the structure is, whereas with C2H4O2 we have to guess. HelpJazz 23:28, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Yeah, but that isn't the chemical formula. That's the structural formula. I put both in, so yeah. DM 00:02, 7 March 2008 (EST)
Ok, I see, I missed the text and was only looking at the formula :) It's most common to list the structural formula and not the chemical formula, since anyone who can add can figure out the chemical formula when given the structural formula, but it doesn't work the other way around. How do you think it looks now? (This is the way I have formatted... almost all of the chemistry articles, though I admit I wasn't entirely rigorous with the chemical/structural distinction.) HelpJazz 10:46, 7 March 2008 (EST)
That works. DM 11:20, 7 March 2008 (EST)


I took a year of Japanese at Harvard. Don't mess with it, if you don't understand it. --Ed Poor Talk 10:27, 7 March 2008 (EST)

I do understand Japanese. There are a lot of pronouns and I thought it useful to put them down. DM 11:14, 7 March 2008 (EST)
Worst possible place to start. At best, it would be misleading. --Ed Poor Talk
That's true. I was going to add more but I just... didn't. Which is a pretty bad excuse.DM 11:55, 7 March 2008 (EST)
It's okay, now we have Japanese language and Pronouns in Japanese, along with Japanese and Korean. Care to take a crack at CJK? --Ed Poor Talk 11:59, 7 March 2008 (EST)
CJK? I'm quite lost now. DM 12:06, 7 March 2008 (EST)

World treasures

We welcome your ideas. Please proceed to edit the missing "treasures". But before deleting anyone, please be so kind to ask first. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 23:01, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

I don't pretend to have a complete list. Even the New 7 wonders were so severely criticized for missing Egypt treasures, that there are 8 wonders now. Please say exactly which one is not good enough. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 23:07, 3 April 2008 (EDT)