Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanH"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by VVAANNDDAALL (Talk); changed back to last version by DanH)
(TO: DanH from Conservative)
Line 242: Line 242:
Ah! That's really cool, and easy to work in. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:00, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
Ah! That's really cool, and easy to work in. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:00, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
== TO: DanH from Conservative ==
Dear Dan,
Please read the email I just sent you.
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:47, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:47, 15 August 2007


User talk:MountainDew

User talk:DanHarchive1


Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter? Conservative 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

  • I am sure you read all that on that other wiki. Check with them. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 22:57, 12 July 2007 (EDT)


So I'm a "vandal" am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their "fun." Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to "get high" and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country.

When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras "It's just a game," "You're a close minded fanatic," and "Get a life." I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a "vandal."

YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, "Oh, this must be safe," but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we?

The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't "judge" video games based on what "a couple crazy kids did." That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. "Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having "fun") justify the means(the death of the innocent" Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile.

Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the "Magic System" (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose "If it feels good, do it." And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.

My page on "anime," as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, Ed Poor Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick "art" blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.

And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said "I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly." Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these "family friendly" websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising.

That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted "entertainment." How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?

But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said "Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder." But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just "harmless fun" and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer.

I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and "coolest" spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too.

I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth.

(P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.)

This post wins the internet. Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [1] --Colest 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
This might be the funniest thing I have ever read Bohdan 23:26, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
  • He seemed "normal" to me on other issues. But then I have no idea what sparked his post, or anything else.... --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 23:33, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Just to nitpick, at the time the Vandals attacked the Roman empire and took over North Africa, they were Arian Christian, not pagan.--Steve 12:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)


does the word Hannibal mean anything to you? heh heh hehBohdan 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

I'll have to get that tomorrow morning; I'm going out of town for three days. DanH 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)


looks like we have a Jack Thompson impersonator trying to take you out, Dan. Or worse yet, Jack himself... I shudder at the mere thought. Be vigiliant, don't bend, we will defend you, Dan. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:02, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

There's only one way to tell... *Creates Article*.--Elamdri 19:07, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
  • ROFL!! Yeah, like he's something to fear, Thompson! You guys kill me sometimes, giving him the reaction he wants, lol. Good idea, Elamdri! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 19:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Dunno about you, Terry, but an opportunity to take on Thompson mano y mano is something I would relish. I hope the article I'm about to write about him attracts his wrath.--Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
NOOO, you blocked him! How am I gonna have any fun now?--Elamdri 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Let's play with this guy - he deserves it. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
I somewhat doubt he's Jack Thompson, he even denied it. But still, wouldn't it be something if we got the real Jack Thompson to come sniffing around?--Elamdri 19:18, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
As of today, that's my new goal. We know he'll find us sooner or later (he gave Wikipedia quite a headache), so let's school him quickly and get it over with. Let's move this discussion to the sysop page, agreed? --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:21, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

Congratulations Div. Chess Champ!

Go Dan! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 23:50, 15 July 2007 (EDT)

Ranger Bill

Sorry, I didn't do that!! My little sister (didn't ask me or anything) just put it up using my user name. Sorry that it happened.--Tash 15:12, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

Dan, evolution article

Dear Dan,

My sister stated to me that the theory of evolution article was a very good article but she said, "What about the man-ape fossils?". So I added the paleoanthropology section which a leading creationist organization is going to publish at their website. I also noticed that Wikipedia did the social effects of the theory of evolution in their evolution article so I added that very briefly. I also noticed that a HUGE issue was left out and that was biological information, biological code, and genetic programs so I added a brief section.

As far as today, Andy added some material that I thought needed better footnoting and wording so that is what I was doing today.

I do think the end result was worth it. Out of 112 million articles on Google for the Theory of evolution ours is ranked #34.

Conservative 18:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)


Congratulations on winning. Not bad for a Jayhawk. --Colest 11:03, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Yes...congratulations! I was always horrible at chess...I just move a piece and see what happens...the word strategy does not exist in my dictionary :) DeborahB. 12:42, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
Congratulations. Bohdan 15:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Thanks all. DanH 15:35, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Belated congrats! --ηοξιμαχονγθαλκ 13:08, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Would you please categorize...

the article on pornography? If I read the history correctly you are the protecting sysop so I figured you'd like first crack at it. May I suggest something simple like "media" for now? I have plans to re-organize many category structures but at the moment that's likely to be your best fit. Of course, you should do as you see fit. Regards, Aziraphale 18:09, 17 July 2007 (EDT) <-I'm just doing them alphabetically, honest!

Hello again,
Would you also please categorize Main Page/new style? Thank you, Aziraphale 12:14, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Good Catch

...On the user name "Bush is retarded" spelt backwards. Of course I guess I should expect that from a chess champion. ;-) Learn together 04:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Hitler's vegetarianism

Hi. What exactly is your source that Hitler wasn't a vegetarian? I've read numerous places that he was, including, I believe, the memoirs of his friend Albert Speer. Is the argument that he wasn't a strict vegetarian? Because there are numerous definitions of vegetarianism, and some allow for limited meat ingestion. If I recall, his reasons were health and not animal ights, but I don't think that matters. PortlyMort 14:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

There's at the very least, enough controversy about whether he was [2] that we shouldn't dogmatically say one way or the other. DanH 14:38, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Hitler's personal chef says his favourite dish was pigeon [3]; it seems from various other sources that while he preferred a vegetarian diet, he deviated enough from it to not be classed as a vegetarian. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 14:46, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
Sources are numerous. One source of good criticism cites how Hitler was not sympathetic to German soldiers freezing in Russia who asked for meat. Hitler went into a long spiel about how the Roman legions survived on grains, etc., and probably regarded meat eaters as subversive to the Nazi effort. Ultimately, many meat eaters probably betrayed the Nazi cause because of this--Hitler just didn't care if meat eaters got fed or not, and expected everybody to be like him and make the same sacrifices during the privations of a prolonged war, which of course to a vegetarian of many years, are not sacrifices at all. RobS 14:52, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
The sources for his meat eating and love of ham and bavarian sausages are numerous also [4]; many commentators also point out that Hitler never claimed to be a vegetarian, outlawed vegetarian organizations and prevented all measures aimed at easing Germany’s food shortages that involved a reduction in meat consumption. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 14:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT)


I want to put a few more pictures in the evolution article. Do you know how to do that? I want to put a picture of Ernst Haeckel in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Evolutionary_theory_and_Cases_of_Fraud.2C_Hoaxes_and_Speculation.E2.80.8E I also want to put a picture of Stephen Gould in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_Punctuated_Equilibrium Please don't use the picture of Stephen Gould used at Wikipedia. Can you help? Conservative 15:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)conservative


Thank you for welcoming me, DanH. BrianJackson 20:37, 20 July 2007 (EDT)


I agree. A lot of post-grunge bands really ruined grunge. Everclear,Third Eye Blind,Matchbox 20, and even Daughtry (he was classified post-grunge too lol) really turned grunge to pop - rock.

(whoops forgot to sign)

--Dark1Kristen 22:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

Favorite Original Grunge Band: Alice In Chains

Favorite Post-Grunge: Three Days Grace or Breaking Benjamin

--Dark1Kristen 22:06, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

Great block!

Great block! Well done!!!!--Aschlafly 22:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Wow, a second great block in the same night!!! Very well done.--Aschlafly 23:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)


The user who put those questionable comments was a sock of vandal redhungary, who I think you dealt with earlier. Bohdan 23:04, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Noah's ark

Heya -- I'm interested in making some changes to Noah's ark -- proposed them on the talk page -- any chance you could try unlocking it for a while and see if revert wars and/or vandalism become a problem? Ungtss 21:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

Please protect my signature templates

The templates in question are:


I am the only person who has any business editing them (aside from Andy). Other users who edit them are probably vandalizing them. Niandra protected them, but then TK unprotected them (he was probably confused since this is a technical issue.) Could you either take it up with other sysops or just go ahead and protect the above templates? Thanks. User:PheasantHunter/FullSig 12:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

Vandal blocking

Good job blocking the vandals. JohnMorrisonBirch 21:20, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

Crop Circles

Dear Dan

I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a "crop circle" (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

  • Joaquin my friend, I beleive I asked you to post in the sysop area about this, no? Please do so. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:03, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

Deletion Request

Hi, you're an admin here, right? Could you delete Charlesincharge?--Offeep 22:31, 27 July 2007 (EDT)

revert on Guillotine

Why is it liberal bias to cite a fact? Capital punishment is indeed contrary to the French constitution following a vote of the French Parliament, in April 2007. I do not understand why you reverted this?Sporean 13:15, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

It probably wasn't, but the term First World seems to imply that. Maybe as in most of Europe, or in much of the world would be a way to put it. DanH 13:16, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

OK. By the way, thank you for having moved Maximilien de Robespierre. Sporean 13:17, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

I would appreciate your support

Dear DanH,

I am sending you a note about the uncited template and how it can substantially increase web traffic to Conservapedia.

The Conservapedia article on homosexuality is now ranked in the top 10 of http://www.google.com searches. I estimate that the Conservapedia article on homosexuality is giving 300-400 people new people a day to know about Conservapedia who wouldn't otherwise know about it. When the article is in the top 5 of the search engine rankings it will bring in SUBSTANTIALLY more as the top 5 entries get the lion's share of the internet traffic.

Now a main reason why the Conservapedia homosexuality article is ranked in the top 10 is that the search engines highly reward articles with footnotes that link to other internet websites. Accordingly, since our uncited template is successful in getting people to cite their material as Andy Schlafly stated, I made note of the uncited template in the following Conservapedia articles:

Conservapedia:Commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments

Conservapedia Manual of Style: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style

Conservapedia:Footnotes - technical help http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help

Currently about 50% of Conservapedia articles are completely uncited and a high percentage of articles that are cited are poorly cited. If this persist, not many people are going to know about Conservapedia as our articles will be poorly ranked by the search engines. However, I strongly believe that the uncited template will make a substantial difference.

Accordingly, I would appreciate your efforts in supporting the uncited template.

Conservative 15:33, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

*Conservative, around here, it is the practice of all Sysops, except you, to discuss changes before implementing them, and asking for support. The Commandments may only be changed upon direct approval from Andy. You did not receive this direct approval, no? Kindly try and act like a mannered person, post your proposals to the Sysops and Andy, then be prepared for discussion and support, not the other way around. I could support your idea, except for the encouragement of placing templates without limitiation. We have far too much clutter already, and your failing to limit template placement, by stating some guideline for what a minimum number of citations is, will lead to chaos and endless debate as to how many are too few and how many are "enough". Thanks. --Sysop-TK --Talk 2 Me 15:58, 29 July 2007 (EDT)

TK, that is untrue as my message on the indicated pages clearly indicates the template is to be placed on a article or section of an article that are COMPLETELY uncited. It also gives the template for merely indicating a sentence that is uncited. Lastly, my cited articles are clearly bringing internet traffic and the uncited articles are not only breaking the conservapedia commandment about citing your sources but they are creating Conservapedia articles filled with unverifiable or hard to verify information. Plus uncited articles are not making a significant impact in regards to bringing in search engine traffic. Conservative 16:07, 29 July 2007 (EDT)


DanH, please do not revert me again. My new post states: broke conservapedia commandments. uncited material. please do not allow the conservapedia commandment breakers to reign freely. Conservative 20:59, 29 July 2007 (EDT)


Why did you delete this? It is a significant town in the English East Midlands and a major centre of steel production. Just because some people have dirty minds, and CP has an absurdly oversensitive spam filter, is no reason for it not to be listed. Pachyderm 07:29, 31 July 2007 (EDT)


Sorry Dan, but I had to revert you. The name of the city is Чорнобиль or chornobyl, but in the russian language it is Чернобыль or chernobyl. The city is both Ukrainian and in Ukraine. I have moved the article so now the link works. Its alot like Kyiv the correct way and Kiev the wrong russian way. Bohdan 02:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT)

Mitt Romney

Thanks for removing the polygamy smear. I was considering removing it, but as a Mormon myself I always get nervous that I'd be accused of trying to cover up the history of my church or something silly like that. I was just about to post on the talk page asking for the opinion of others when I saw your edit; far more efficient. :-) Jinkas 18:39, 3 August 2007 (EDT)

Flying machine revert

Why did you do it? My bit was accurate and on point.Bafi 20:57, 4 August 2007 (EDT)

Professional wrestling

Could you delete Professional wrestling? It was created by the vandal you just blocked. Thanks. Jazzman831 17:13, 5 August 2007 (EDT)

Transcluded text

Hi, Mountain Dew! I created Template:Famine of 1933 as transcluded text. You or anyone can edit it easily, because there is a special edit link in all three articles which invoke the template. --Ed Poor Talk 17:58, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

Ah! That's really cool, and easy to work in. DanH 18:00, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

TO: DanH from Conservative

Dear Dan,

Please read the email I just sent you.

Conservative 19:47, 15 August 2007 (EDT)