User talk:DanH

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PheasantHunter (Talk | contribs) at 16:28, 26 July 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Archives:

User talk:MountainDew

User talk:DanHarchive1


unicode

Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter? Conservative 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

  • I am sure you read all that on that other wiki. Check with them. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 22:57, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Vandal?

So I'm a "vandal" am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their "fun." Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to "get high" and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country.

When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras "It's just a game," "You're a close minded fanatic," and "Get a life." I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a "vandal."

YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, "Oh, this must be safe," but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we?

The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't "judge" video games based on what "a couple crazy kids did." That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. "Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having "fun") justify the means(the death of the innocent" Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile.

Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the "Magic System" (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose "If it feels good, do it." And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.

My page on "anime," as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, Ed Poor Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick "art" blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.

And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said "I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly." Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these "family friendly" websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising.

That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted "entertainment." How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?

But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said "Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder." But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just "harmless fun" and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer.

I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and "coolest" spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too.

I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth.

(P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.)

This post wins the internet. Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [1] --Colest 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
This might be the funniest thing I have ever read Bohdan 23:26, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
  • He seemed "normal" to me on other issues. But then I have no idea what sparked his post, or anything else.... --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 23:33, 12 July 2007 (EDT)

Just to nitpick, at the time the Vandals attacked the Roman empire and took over North Africa, they were Arian Christian, not pagan.--Steve 12:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

reminder

does the word Hannibal mean anything to you? heh heh hehBohdan 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

I'll have to get that tomorrow morning; I'm going out of town for three days. DanH 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

Uh-oh...

looks like we have a Jack Thompson impersonator trying to take you out, Dan. Or worse yet, Jack himself... I shudder at the mere thought. Be vigiliant, don't bend, we will defend you, Dan. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:02, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

There's only one way to tell... *Creates Article*.--Elamdri 19:07, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
  • ROFL!! Yeah, like he's something to fear, Thompson! You guys kill me sometimes, giving him the reaction he wants, lol. Good idea, Elamdri! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 19:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Dunno about you, Terry, but an opportunity to take on Thompson mano y mano is something I would relish. I hope the article I'm about to write about him attracts his wrath.--Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
NOOO, you blocked him! How am I gonna have any fun now?--Elamdri 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Let's play with this guy - he deserves it. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
I somewhat doubt he's Jack Thompson, he even denied it. But still, wouldn't it be something if we got the real Jack Thompson to come sniffing around?--Elamdri 19:18, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
As of today, that's my new goal. We know he'll find us sooner or later (he gave Wikipedia quite a headache), so let's school him quickly and get it over with. Let's move this discussion to the sysop page, agreed? --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:21, 13 July 2007 (EDT)

Congratulations Div. Chess Champ!

Go Dan! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 23:50, 15 July 2007 (EDT)

Ranger Bill

Sorry, I didn't do that!! My little sister (didn't ask me or anything) just put it up using my user name. Sorry that it happened.--Tash 15:12, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

Dan, evolution article

Dear Dan,

My sister stated to me that the theory of evolution article was a very good article but she said, "What about the man-ape fossils?". So I added the paleoanthropology section which a leading creationist organization is going to publish at their website. I also noticed that Wikipedia did the social effects of the theory of evolution in their evolution article so I added that very briefly. I also noticed that a HUGE issue was left out and that was biological information, biological code, and genetic programs so I added a brief section.

As far as today, Andy added some material that I thought needed better footnoting and wording so that is what I was doing today.

I do think the end result was worth it. Out of 112 million articles on Google for the Theory of evolution ours is ranked #34.

Conservative 18:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

Chess

Congratulations on winning. Not bad for a Jayhawk. --Colest 11:03, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Yes...congratulations! I was always horrible at chess...I just move a piece and see what happens...the word strategy does not exist in my dictionary :) DeborahB. 12:42, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
Congratulations. Bohdan 15:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Thanks all. DanH 15:35, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Belated congrats! --ηοξιμαχονγθαλκ 13:08, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Would you please categorize...

the article on pornography? If I read the history correctly you are the protecting sysop so I figured you'd like first crack at it. May I suggest something simple like "media" for now? I have plans to re-organize many category structures but at the moment that's likely to be your best fit. Of course, you should do as you see fit. Regards, Aziraphale 18:09, 17 July 2007 (EDT) <-I'm just doing them alphabetically, honest!

Hello again,
Would you also please categorize Main Page/new style? Thank you, Aziraphale 12:14, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Good Catch

...On the user name "Bush is retarded" spelt backwards. Of course I guess I should expect that from a chess champion. ;-) Learn together 04:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Hitler's vegetarianism

Hi. What exactly is your source that Hitler wasn't a vegetarian? I've read numerous places that he was, including, I believe, the memoirs of his friend Albert Speer. Is the argument that he wasn't a strict vegetarian? Because there are numerous definitions of vegetarianism, and some allow for limited meat ingestion. If I recall, his reasons were health and not animal ights, but I don't think that matters. PortlyMort 14:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

There's at the very least, enough controversy about whether he was [2] that we shouldn't dogmatically say one way or the other. DanH 14:38, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Hitler's personal chef says his favourite dish was pigeon [3]; it seems from various other sources that while he preferred a vegetarian diet, he deviated enough from it to not be classed as a vegetarian. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 14:46, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
Sources are numerous. One source of good criticism cites how Hitler was not sympathetic to German soldiers freezing in Russia who asked for meat. Hitler went into a long spiel about how the Roman legions survived on grains, etc., and probably regarded meat eaters as subversive to the Nazi effort. Ultimately, many meat eaters probably betrayed the Nazi cause because of this--Hitler just didn't care if meat eaters got fed or not, and expected everybody to be like him and make the same sacrifices during the privations of a prolonged war, which of course to a vegetarian of many years, are not sacrifices at all. RobS 14:52, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
The sources for his meat eating and love of ham and bavarian sausages are numerous also [4]; many commentators also point out that Hitler never claimed to be a vegetarian, outlawed vegetarian organizations and prevented all measures aimed at easing Germany’s food shortages that involved a reduction in meat consumption. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 14:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Request

I want to put a few more pictures in the evolution article. Do you know how to do that? I want to put a picture of Ernst Haeckel in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Evolutionary_theory_and_Cases_of_Fraud.2C_Hoaxes_and_Speculation.E2.80.8E I also want to put a picture of Stephen Gould in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_Punctuated_Equilibrium Please don't use the picture of Stephen Gould used at Wikipedia. Can you help? Conservative 15:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)conservative

Thanks

Thank you for welcoming me, DanH. BrianJackson 20:37, 20 July 2007 (EDT)


Grunge

I agree. A lot of post-grunge bands really ruined grunge. Everclear,Third Eye Blind,Matchbox 20, and even Daughtry (he was classified post-grunge too lol) really turned grunge to pop - rock.

(whoops forgot to sign)

--Dark1Kristen 22:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

Favorite Original Grunge Band: Alice In Chains

Favorite Post-Grunge: Three Days Grace or Breaking Benjamin

--Dark1Kristen 22:06, 22 July 2007 (EDT)

Great block!

Great block! Well done!!!!--Aschlafly 22:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Wow, a second great block in the same night!!! Very well done.--Aschlafly 23:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

thanks

The user who put those questionable comments was a sock of vandal redhungary, who I think you dealt with earlier. Bohdan 23:04, 23 July 2007 (EDT)

Noah's ark

Heya -- I'm interested in making some changes to Noah's ark -- proposed them on the talk page -- any chance you could try unlocking it for a while and see if revert wars and/or vandalism become a problem? Ungtss 21:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

Please protect my signature templates

The templates in question are:

and

I am the only person who has any business editing them (aside from Andy). Other users who edit them are probably vandalizing them. Niandra protected them, but then TK unprotected them (he was probably confused since this is a technical issue.) Could you either take it up with other sysops or just go ahead and protect the above templates? Thanks. User:PheasantHunter/FullSig 12:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)