Difference between revisions of "User talk:DavidZa"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reverting on Uganda)
(Reverting on Uganda)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
The user has less than 10 edits and a previous edit of theirs removed some content from another page -- which was quickly reverted by another user and was blocked for doing so. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:41, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
 
The user has less than 10 edits and a previous edit of theirs removed some content from another page -- which was quickly reverted by another user and was blocked for doing so. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:41, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:And? They could have made ONE edit and would be as trustable as anybody else.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 13:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:And? They could have made ONE edit and would be as trustable as anybody else.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 13:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
::Actually, the material on that Bill isn't referenced; the link is no longer valid. And don't even get me started on the disgusting defence of that Bill which someone previously inserted. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 13:47, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 12:47, 24 September 2011

Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, DavidZa, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, DavidZa!


--CPalmer 09:13, 21 September 2011 (EDT)

Earthquakes

If you get into an edit war they'll just block you. Best to explain the facts to Aschlafly and Karajou. Once they see the data I'm sure they'll agree. --FindlayT 13:09, 21 September 2011 (EDT)

Reverting on Uganda

I was merely reverting a user's questionable removing of cited content.

The user has less than 10 edits and a previous edit of theirs removed some content from another page -- which was quickly reverted by another user and was blocked for doing so. ~ JonG ~ 13:41, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

And? They could have made ONE edit and would be as trustable as anybody else.--SeanS 13:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
Actually, the material on that Bill isn't referenced; the link is no longer valid. And don't even get me started on the disgusting defence of that Bill which someone previously inserted. DavidZa 13:47, 24 September 2011 (EDT)