Difference between revisions of "User talk:DeanS"

Revision as of 22:10, May 11, 2009

Archive: 01 02 03

Just to make sure

Hey DeanS! So just to make sure you know - the delete proposal that I put on the talk page you deleted was mean for the main page (Template:Infobox Secondary school) - I couldn't put it on the main page itself because it's protected.--IDuan 19:10, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

Done. Thanks for the explanation. --DeanS^talk 20:49, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

Thank you for unblocking me, DeanS, and I'm sorry for going to another administrator, but I could not find your email address on your profile page--I'm new and didn't know that it's on the left side of the screen or that Conservapedia has that addition. Happy trails, Avalerion.

No problem. I had previously contacted other administrators about your account and we resolved the issue. --DeanS^talk 13:35, 11 May 2009 (EDT)

I edited and provided the links, if you would like to check it out and make sure that I obeyed the rules of Conservapedia. Avalerion.

I need your help. I have an administrator saying that "truth" is anti-American when it speaks of the battles between the "Federalists" and "Anti-Federalists". How do I alert other administrators to have them settle the dispute? Avalerion

Avalerion is not interested in truth--he wants to demean and delegitimitze the US Constitution and the US government, and ridicule and attack the founding fathers as well. He needs "help" all right. RJJensen 17:43, 11 May 2009 (EDT)

First off, I am not a 'he'. Second, I did not delegitimize the Consitution. Though it had illegal means of being made and adopted, it was finally ratified by all, even though it was established before the last states ratified it. Thirdly, I did not ridicule the founding fathers. Stop lying and being rude! You're supposed to be an administrator, being an example of how others should act, and instead you act like a name-calling child. Avalerion

It was my impression she was only recently aware of the "Constitution Conspiracy" claptrap. As she was adding references, but not changing the articles, I don't know if Avalerion was seeking a fight, or just reacting strongly as many do when stumbling across the nut cases who claim all of the Founding Fathers were engaged in some fantastic plot, no doubt directed by the Free Mason's or quite possibly the Illuminati! I asked Dean to reconsider the original blocking, RJ, based on nothing more than my belief they were not sinister. If you feel otherwise, please let me know, via email, and feel free to block the user. --₮K_/Admin^/Talk 18:01, 11 May 2009 (EDT)

After seeing the commotion caused by Avalerion, I have reinstated the block. I didn't like her edits in the first place, and her recent comments to RJJensen are not appropriate. --DeanS^talk 18:06, 11 May 2009 (EDT)

I agree with DeanS. RJJensen 18:10, 11 May 2009 (EDT)