User talk:Fongman

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links

Welcome!

Hello, Fongman, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Fongman!


-- 50 star flag.png User:Deborah (contributions) (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

Copying from Wikipedia

Fongman, you are not allowed to copy articles from wikipedia-- 50 star flag.png User:Deborah (contributions) (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

Fongman did you create those articles on wikipedia-- 50 star flag.png User:Deborah (contributions) (talk) 22:57, 24 April 2008 (EDT)


I was the original author of the articles that I posted this evening. I am posting them here, because a wiki editor and a wiki administrator are currently on a liberal crusade to gut my articles. They are currently ripping out umpteen backlinks. Fongman 22:59, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

There have been several editors on at least one of those articles. You cannot claim it is your work alone. AliceBG 23:00, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

I looked at the edits they only altered parameters on a template which he removed when he copied it to conservapedia-- 50 star flag.png User:Deborah (contributions) (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2008 (EDT)


Put {{Copied from|site user=Trasel}} --~~~~ on the talk page of Ragnar Benson‎ and Retreat, this means you are the author of these wikipedia articles and allow them to be on conservapedia -- 50 star flag.png User:Deborah (contributions) (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

---

My thanks to Conservapedia for so graciously granting me poltical refugee status. I grew weary of the relentless liberally-biased editing that my articles received at Wikipedia. The editors there twist the rules to suit their fancy and to push their political agenda. They won't admit it, but their biases against conservatives and Christians are blatant. If I had just been a liberal lesbian wiccan, I'm sure that they would have viewed my articles as simply SPLENDID. I spent two years at Wikipedia tilting at windmills. One of my articles barely survived two deletion campaigns, but lost the third. Fongman 00:19, 25 April 2008 (EDT)

Hello Fongman, Administrator Philip J. Rayment here. What Deborah said above in her post dated 23:07 24 April is a requirement, so please make sure you do it as soon as possible or your articles will be deleted here. Philip J. Rayment 05:08, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for that. Actually, Deborah's comment was not quite correct. What she should have said was to put {{Copied from|user=Fongman|site-user=Trasel}} on those pages. Anyway, I've fixed them for you. Philip J. Rayment 09:39, 25 April 2008 (EDT)

Welcome, tired traveller. I too was "expelled from the academy" at Wikipedia. I used to run the mailing list; I was a bureaucrat and administrator. Now I'm on probation for "tendentious editing", which is what they call adding an opposing view to a biased article. The last straw was when I was banned from their intelligent design article.

Please be careful to take the correct version of your original work; we don't want any fuss over alleged violations of free licensed work. I assume you know that your contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors BUT that the derivative work thereby created is NOT free licensed. Call it a quirk, but Mr. Schlafly has a good reason for it. (If you can't leave with these terms, let us know immediately.) --Ed Poor Talk 10:00, 25 April 2008 (EDT)

We welcome your informative edits that the liberals at Wikipedia censor. Do the Wikipedians really think they can ignore conservative truths just be censoring them?--Andy Schlafly 22:54, 6 March 2010 (EST)